Search results

OK? Depending on further details, I'm not sure what is stopping you playing that character. Or maybe with those further details, it will turn out that the character is too passive to be a good fit for a MHRP or variant game.

This is getting increasingly bizarre. I told you what the Cunning specialty covers: I don't remember anyone at my trouble finding this hard to grasp.

Here's an example of author stance play in MHRP/Cortex+ Fantasy Hack: The player of the berserker wants to earn XP, and so declares the impulsive action (thus earning 1 XP) and thus prompts an ally to rebuke him for his violence (thus earning 3 XP). The player was not inhabiting his character...

I still don't know what you mean by "author stance" or "actor stance" as you are not using them in the only sense I'm familiar with. "Trad" RPGing is replete with author stance play - the players know the GM has placed obstacles and opportunities into the fiction, and so motivate their PCs to...

In any RPG, the fiction is likely to contain interesting and salient things. Otherwise play would be very boring! As I've already posted, the accuracy of knowledge, conjectures etc is not independent of a person's expertise. Any player with half a brain can see that dice model correlations which...

My "counter argument" is that your description of an "incentive structure" is not borne out in play. If your play is yielding degenerate incentive structures, I infer that your GM is not very good at framing scenes and establishing consequences.

OK. My post wasn't addressed to you.

What meta knowledge?

I don't think BitD has much in common with any of the three RPGs I mentioned. It uses a different way of establishing opposition; a different resolution system; a different PC advancement system. What do you think is similar? Have you read the rules for Burning Wheel, Torchbearer 2e or Marvel...

@TwoSix knows these things because I posted them on these threads, and I am able to provide accurate and reliable accounts of my own play experiences. I don't know what you mean by "tricky". It's clear that a player in MHRP, in declaring an action, has to state what effect they are attempting to...

How much first hand experience do you have of MHRP? Burning Wheel? Torchbearer 2e? As I said, I am confident in my knowledge of the incentive structures of those games. They do not work like you say. Perhaps there are elements of those games you're ignorant of? I don't know.

So if I want to know whether I should take the left road or the right road, Guidance will tell me? Like Augury but for free?

I trust my own experience, over conjectures that are not founded on experience. I know what the incentive structure of the RPGs I play is, because I've seen it at work.

When you make assertions, I'm not obliged to agree with them just because you make them. You don't like player authorship, direct or mediated via rules, unless the thing the player authors (directly or indirectly) is also something that the player's character produces, via their actions, in the...

You don't like my play. You'd rather it not be? Its existence irks you? Wrongs you? Quite odd to me.

I don't know what this means. As in what does it mean to "not agree" with how someone else plays a game? Some people enjoy wargaming. I don't, really, That doesn't mean I "don't agree" with their way of doing things! You are also positing some weird monomania on the part of each RPGer. When I...

And as you know, I find your play too much of a railroad.

What does necessity have to do with it? Not everyone who plays RPGs wants to engage in nothing but map-and-key play. It's not some bizarre deviance from an obvious norm.

I'm not talking about preferences. I'm talking about accurate description. I mean, if I said that I find your game silly because in your game fighters kill Orcs by rolling polyhedral dice, I'm guessing you'd object. (I'm also a bit puzzled that you take my reply to @Micah Sweet to be addressed...