Search results

Deleted due to mod remark :)

He made a statistics joke.

Its not Normalcy Bias at all. I just don't feel like writing paragraphs about the factors on ENWORLD

Well people wanted Spelljammer back and that was done poorly. I would rather it remain shelved than an attempt made to modernize it. They even brought the Star Frontiers races but really really made a scandal out of Hadozee/Yazirians. That's why in hindsite, especially after seeing things like...

OK like I said I disagree. Qualitatively they did Dragonlance poorly.

Whose trying to win points? Its just the way it is and has been. Nothing is stopping this.

At least in the USA. But I think a lot of problems of late have shown it IS Possible. We have the means, just not the will.

This has been the case since the Industrial Revolution. Since we're living through this one it just seems MORE Scary. This is exactly how Manufacturing labor felt last century. My supermarket took out three more cashier stations for self checkout. It's been happening for a long time...

I love this community. This issue is being met with the proper amount of rationality here. On TTRPG Twitter theres nothing but Chickens running around clucking like the world is going to end.

So find it Tiresome then. I find it Tiresome they can't showcase settings correctly. I too Agree to Disagree on your assessment.

Fortunately I have my Palladium copy of Teenage Mutant nInja Turtles and other strangeness. If my players want to play a Tortle I will instead suggest maybe they want to play that game.

I strongly disagree here. I read a loton ENWorld and don't always want to take the comment. But the rationality on this site FAR FAR outweighs most corners of the internet unless youre in a curated Discord. ANd compared to social media? There is no place on social media in any fandom that is...

Its not that. Nobody working on these books has any knowledge of settings. And it shows. That's the thing. They fired Mike Mearls, and then quietly moved him off of D&D Development before that because people on Twitter were upset for nothing. If youre going to do a Dragonlance adventure...

PLanets are big. I have no problem envisioning some of these people never meeting, especially when underground or on mountain tops. Adventurers come in contact with them. In no way do I find the fact there could be monster settlements or civilization that humans don't know about surprising...

NO. Dancing is Forbidden.

Which also all branch of the Aldmer. I have extended it further to the Aldmer being the PRIMAL ELVES that complete Elves and MordenkainenToF refer to. Emigrators due to Corellon's disappointment and he's not even in generational memory anymore.

No. its simply if you are running a classic D&D campaign world that is anthrocentric it is extremely unlikely monster races could function as an adventuring group that needs to interact with wider society. A MOS EISLEY game is the assumption that all these sentient races are integrated...

THe Mos Eisley is meant as a Tavern analog. WHo would be in Water deep. I am a curator. Like I put museums to shame. I do not Curate the Monster Manual. They all have their societies, but even in Forgotten Realms at least in my game, Humans are now the primary society. So in SIgil, Mos...

I have no shame admitting I am a snob for this sort of thing. Lore is the most important thing to me because that's just me. I am well aware its not everyone's primary. But I like to discuss it and there are really not as many places as ENWORLD to do so.

Its not wrong but I carefully Curate my games. Its not hard. The only races I have come around to are the Plane touched and Genasi, and Kzinti Race type. When I'm playing fantasy genre I don't like the Mos Eisley panoply.