Search results

  1. W

    Spoilers Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

    Think also about the child labor laws and how many hours (both per week and consecutive hours) you can have a child work. If you have massively-multiple hours of makeup-chair time (putting it on and then taking it off), you might end up with 1-2 takes worth of time where they can actually do the...
  2. W

    General star wars talk/discussion/complaining

    Those are all accomplishments or positive qualities. By themselves, perhaps not enough to make the character standout cool. The one orc in The Two Towers that survives Legolas's arrows and gets the bomb in place to break the walls of Helm's Deep gets a badass moment, but isn't treated with fan...
  3. bUNXwFD.jpg

    bUNXwFD.jpg

  4. W

    General star wars talk/discussion/complaining

    Reasonable. However, I think they did telegraph something special for the character. They were advertising him as a big deal (action figure, animated story in the holiday special). And in ESB there were six bounty hunters, but only he gets direct interaction from Vader, and only he actually does...
  5. W

    General star wars talk/discussion/complaining

    Boba Fett is the ur-example of a wasted opportunity. I think people caught what was being set up, even if it didn't come to fruition. The SW holiday special and then ESB set a trajectory where he was going to do something pivotal and impressive in the next installment(s). It's just that between...
  6. W

    D&D 3.x Still playing 3e? Share your 3.0 and/or 3.5 house rules

    The same with Lion Totem barbarians getting pounce, and all the other (mostly late-game) hoops many-to-most* martials jump through to get full attacks with more than 5' movement. *minus Bo9S classes, uber-charger, and all the other exceptions who get decent attacks with more than 5' move some...
  7. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Beast Master attack sacrificed for beast attack and Dual Wielder

    I think they are both sub-optimal. The primary advantages of twf w/ Dual Wielder over PAM are that is compliments Dex and can be stacked on top of Nick-based off-hand attack. Otherwise it is inferior (as it should be). Both of them struggle with the limited number of situations where you can get...
  8. W

    D&D 5E (2014) Dungeoncraft Interview with Mike Mearls

    The problem I foresee in this is that they two materials still have to be mechanically married to each other*, but the developers of the lower-level stuff will have little reason to design to ensure that the upper level stuff works well. That seems to have happened with 3.0's Epic Level...
  9. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Magic Missile is saved! Hooray!

    Yes, derived from oD&D where it was specifically 'per a magic arrow' which was "Magic Arrows have a +1 chance of hitting their target and do additional damage to their target unless specified otherwise due to the type of monster being shot. Thus, a Magic Arrow normally does from 2-7 points of...
  10. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Magic Missile is saved! Hooray!

    The amount of hue and cry over game rulings has never correlated with either how 'official' they became, how officious the ruler was trying to be, or what question they were answering (what they thought the rule said, what it was supposed to say, or what they thought it should be). The correct...
  11. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Beast Master attack sacrificed for beast attack and Dual Wielder

    I'm not sure if we are looking at the same feat. For a non-Beastmaster Ranger, it looks like a very good feat. If both of your weapons are light, and one of them has the nick property, it looks to me like you can add two attacks to your standard allotment. Ex. level 4 (to keep multi-attack out...
  12. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Beast Master attack sacrificed for beast attack and Dual Wielder

    I quoted the relevant part of the feat in my post. I omitted that this attack is on top of the one made using nick. I think you might be thinking of the 2014 feat. Right, so you can attack with your main hand, trade your nick attack for the beast attack, and get a bonus attack via Dual Wielder...
  13. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Beast Master attack sacrificed for beast attack and Dual Wielder

    I think I know the answer, but wondering what others think. Beast Master states: "In Combat, the beast acts during your turn. It can move and use its Reaction on its own, but the only action it takes is the Dodge action unless you take a Bonus Action to command it to take an action in its stat...
  14. W

    General star wars talk/discussion/complaining

    I have no idea what you...oh, ohhhhh. Oh, that's not right!
  15. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Youre All Wrong. Its Not A Martial vs Caster Situation

    There certainly was variation in how powerful casters were based on how easy the DM made it for the party to exit the dungeon and rest up/recharge their spells (making it campaign dependent). It's worthwhile to note that, for AD&D (in particular and in comparison to some in the basic-classic...
  16. W

    General star wars talk/discussion/complaining

    What? Some of the best concept albums of all time: AquaPorg Close to the Porg Dark Side of the Porg In a Glass Porg In the Court of the Crimson Porg. Moving Porgs One Porg Fits All Porg of the Century Porg Salad Surgery Porg's Tongue in Aspic The Porg Lies Down on Broadway Thick as a Porg...
  17. W

    General star wars talk/discussion/complaining

    I'm a big fan of porg rock. Er, wait...
  18. W

    D&D 5E (2024) Martial/Caster fix.

    I certainly don't think that (ex.) 16th level play is too caster-centric because the 16th level caster is casting too many level 2-4 spells. Although that they are casting 1+ levelled spell every round might be an issue (and that is a symptom of not enough encounters per rest). Someone else...
  19. W

    Your table is YOUR table.

    I tend to agree that (like it or lump it) a whole lot of internet discussion over fandom ends up being a competition for the hearts, minds, opinions, or team identity decisions of the rest of the community. Whether that's "controlling" hearts and minds (and whether it is okay) depends probably...
  20. W

    Hot take: get rid of the "balanced party" paradigm

    Yes, good point. This addresses the fundamental situation that makes the hot take become highlighted. It's still a balanced party though, just not balanced playing-player's-PCs or however one phrases that. I think 'hot take: ' ends up being synonymous with 'thought experiment:' most of the...
Top