Search results

Is there a verification process in place? Just wondering how any potential accusations of AI use would be handled.

I noticed that earlier, as well. It was a little confusing: because the text entry box was still at bottom, I thought it hadn't been posted despite the message. So I tried again, but it told me it had been posted and i had to wait so many seconds to post again.

I'm so terribly sorry I didn't phrase the question in the most grammatically optimal manner.

Edit: I understand there was a forum software upgrade, so I assume that's what this is. Please disregard, thanks. I'm browsing on a laptop, and I see article links and embeds show huge headlines. They're so big that they're often truncated, even on a regular (non-mobile) screen. Is it just...

I DO MY OWN RESEARCH ! ! !

Well, to be perfectly fair, it's from an office called "Legal Law", so surely it must be 100% totally legit. Now, if it was called "Illegal Law", you might be somewhat justified in being slightly suspicious, of course.

Yeah, I tried to explain why the costs are so low on those, but it's hard to argue with the low prices. I haven't looked for a dumb TV recently, but I get the impression they're mostly extinct now, anyway.

There's one I keep reading as "My Sausage Experience".

Based on a little unverified googling, it's a 45" screen (rear projection, apparently) weighing 359 lbs. It cost $2800 in 1978 (without vcr, if i understand correctly), or nearly $13,000 in 2022 dollars. 🤯 .msust bought a 50" smart tv for under $300 last weekend.

Anyway, since the question is about a trap's general nature, maybe just invent an explicit definition for "general nature". It might encompass things like: - whether the trap's trigger/s is/are mechanical, magical, or hybrid; and - whether the trap is designed to cause damage, and --- (maybe)...

If i understand correctly, el-remmen (OP) is looking at modifying this spell for his houserules, and is looking for suggestions. Adherence to RAW isn't an overarching concern, I don't think.

Someone in another thread posted a pic of the rust monsters in the D&D movie. They were depicted as rat-sized critters up in the rafters eating a lock or something. A neat take on the rust monster, imo. What if such little rust monsters have a complex life-cycle? In "good" times, they're mostly...

Yeah, i was going to suggesta domain of dread, too. They're nice and self-contained and have an obvious bad guy. Van Richten's presents a fairly strightforward rubrik to build on out yourself, too, if that's an option. A more off-kilter suggestion might be Neverland. It's an island sandbox...

Of course I watched it; I was 10. It wasn't a choice. It was a duty, in service to the gods of Saturday morning cartoons.

Maybe it's one of those clever nested acronyms* where "mac" is short for "mac and cheese". * Interestingly, the word for a nested acronym is "macronym", but how that relates to macaroni and cheese is still undetermined.

No, I don't care at all where a DM sources their monsters. Brand new, surprising monsters are great; as are completely reskinned MM monsters. The one caveat, imo, is just be consistent within the campaign.

<insert very strong opinion about darkvision here>

The 2e Monstrous Manual depiction of the invisible stalker is especially memorable, and seems pretty accurate: