Search results

weather and environmental conditions while resting is the one thing i think LTH ought to be allowed and expected to trivialize.

i do think it would be possible to discern between safe and poisonous edibles using survival but i also think using nature would provide a notably lower DC attempting a check for the same information. honestly if i were to merge one of these skills i think it would be nature, but by absorbing...

No, you don't know if these specific mushrooms are poisonous, but you are aware of the possibility they may be, so you instead decide to skip the risk entirely and forage on the other plants and animals that that don’t have a possibility for mistaking them as something not poisonous,

can it work in a city if i'm using my special nature themed deck of cards that use the suits of leaves, berries, raindrops and twigs?

using my survival skill to cheat at cards because i need the money to survive by buying groceries and paying rent :ROFLMAO:

i'm not saying that, i'm saying that i've often heard people claiming stories about people who try to justify being able to jump and climb and otherwise use acrobatics in place of a bunch of stuff athletics is meant to cover.

honestly i'm kind of surprised this wasn't the other way around, i feel like i've heard far more stories about acrobatics being allowed to absorb a bunch of stuff athletics is meant to do rather than the other way around, especially with it working off the base stat of dexterity which is...

nature is more than knowing what certain plants and animals are and what the weather is doing survival is more than knowing what not to eat or is dangerous to touch the venn diagram between the two may have some overlap, but it's certainly far from total overlap

why is it at all bad or wrong that i'm cherry picking? firstly i haven't seen the media she's depicted in outside of the ones i specified so i didn't want to unintentionally include factors that would influence my example, and secondly why am i obligated to take the entirety of a character...

the cross media significance of titles is meaningless, that she is called a witch means nothing for what class she would represent/be in DnD, she is a powered individual who specialises in mental manipulation and raw energy manipulation who's powers are directly correlated to her emotions...

you literally quoted me saying i'm only referencing AoU to IW

do you know what character i see as a nigh fundamental depiction of a psion? MCU scarlet witch (age of ultron to infinity war, i haven't seen them in anything beyond that point)

in '24 it straight up is expertise they gain with level 2 deft explorer feature (pushed back one level from '14), and they get two more at, 9th level i think it is? for a total of three expertise unless i missed something.

i like the expertise in canny but the extra languages are a bit meh, i might replace them with tool proficiencies, especially in '24 given tools seem to have more use.

you'd think having breading would be held in high regards for a people so invested in good food and cooking! :ROFLMAO:

what you say is true but what i meant was that the emphasis of '24 ranger's design on hunter's mark seems to wants us to believe that hunter's mark IS ranger's 'signature feature' comparable to rage or sneak attack. personally i think favoured foe and terrain in a different incarnation could've...

i'd have to disagree with you, i absolutely despise HM in it's entirety.

that just means we can grandfather in SO MANY features for it. :LOL:

and as much as '24 seems to be trying to convince us of it, hunter's mark is not 'it.'

sure, but they weren't exactly the only classes that existed in that edition were they? and the list of feats the fighter could take were a bunch of fightery things intended to serve as your class features within a theme, the fighter couldn't just take wildshape could they? plus, i suspect many...