Search results

I just watched the Fireside Chat with Mercer and Mulligan, and they talk a fair bit about having the main architects of D&D on their team, so that when they need a new creature or item or whatever, Perkins and Crawford just make it for them and it almost feels canon.

I think that it is mostly DM types (i.e. 90%+ of the people on this forum, I suspect) that are driven to try out different TTRPGs and mechanics. It's a lot of expense, in terms of time, money, and effort, and as you say, your average player doesn't see the value in the proposition. I can get my...

Monster Manual 2 would be very welcome - one thing I've noticed about using books that have come out since the 2024 rules update is that older monsters feel both weak and one dimensional. In the 2024 book, most monsters are not only tougher but have some kind of tactical option, even if it's...

Hot take: maybe the Critical Role cast just love playing D&D as much as they've always said they do. Ashley Johnson has said in multiple interviews that, if CR all went away tomorrow, they'd still be getting together every week to play. She's waxed poetic about how much D&D, specifically...

Agreed - he’s become increasingly negative and often feels like he’s rooting against WotC.

He's never run a campaign remotely as long as CR C1-3, each of which come in at many hundreds of hours. I think that may be one of the reasons that this is being described as more like three campaigns that sometimes link.

The Unsleeping City is New York - it's not like Mulligan had to invent the New York Stock Exchange, the Statue of Liberty, Staten Island, etc. It's apples and oranges comparing it to someplace like Zadash, just one of many cities that Mercer built from scratch for Exandria. I'm quite familiar...

Same - I cut back and forth.

I have questions about Brennan Lee Mulligan's ability to run an epic CR campaign - his campaigns have always been much shorter and rely far heavier on improvisation than Mercer's. He doesn't do remotely the world-building prep that Mercer does, by his own admission. Though splitting it into...

With regards to the OP, I'm not surprised. Daggerheart is not really built for long campaigns, but beyond that, its brand recognition is tiny compared to D&D's. In a way, CR are victims of their own success in that DH has been popular enough that using it for their next campaign even seemed...

I think you made an assumption. CR and WotC still work together. They do support their own system. No, it was originally in a modified 4e, then in Pathfinder, then migrated to 5e at Geek&Sundry's request, because D&D is a much better known brand. There was no "endorsement money" involved...

And, as previously quoted, the current PHB specifies that a Tiefling’s ancestry has no bearing on their morality - play them how you like. Arguments about “evil” vs. “Evil” are besides the point (also, note that the PHB pointedly uses the word “moral” rather than “alignment”).

Here is the description of Tieflings from the current PHB (emphasis added): Which is fine by me - I don't use alignment so, while most fiends have motives that are inimical to mortals, not all of them do.

I am intriqued to learn more about this game as it seems very unique, not to mention successful if you have hundreds of players at any one time! Kudos for making it happen! I'm sure that the text of the FR 2025 books will reflect the current design philosophy of WotC, and the strong trend among...

I agree that the pacing is odd, but I also think the casting is bad. Specifically, I do not buy Chris Rock or, especially, Jason Schwartzman as mob bosses - I kept thinking "hey, it's like the kid from Rushmore wrote and starred in his own mob show rather than Viet Nam epic." Fargo (the TV...

I just read The Tainted Cup - it's really good! Fantasy murder mystery with Kaiju thrown in. The protagonist is a genetically modfied Watson for his boss's ASD Sherlock.

Eh, I just watched season 4 of Fargo. It's not good. Otherwise, I agree with you. But I can;t call a series a masterpiece that has that season in it. The first two episodes of this series are promising but there is a lot of style over substance happening.

With some Westworld thrown in.

I understand what the writers are getting at, but I don't believe it - for me great writing doesn't take me out of the story. I think it makes his character cartoonish.

Could you clarify a bit more? Is this a situation where players might wind up with different DMs, and you need to ensure that there is a more or less uniform experience? Or are they typically always with the same DM? I'm wondering why each individual DM can't chat with their players to...