Search results

I agree in principle but actually wish some of my players would look at their character sheet more.

Your friend punches you in the face over D&D, and you're the one that has to apologize? Yeesh. I guess their being 12 explains that. Being so angry however many decades later I find harder to explain. :unsure:o_O:cool::poop:

Thron Greenman, human druid (circle of the land, swamp). A former barrister who a decade ago fled his position when his criminal activity was discovered, escaping into the wilderness where he was taken in by a circle of druids. He eventually joined them, coming to the conclusion that his own...

Maybe I’ve played too much 2e and 3e, where touch attacks were a thing, but I would have required an attack roll for the touch too. Presumably the dragon was trying not to be touched (though granting advantage also makes sense to me).

Yes. I was gonna say "However you want them to." But for my own current games, devils either need to use portals that are activated from the the prime material plane side or straight up ritualistically summoned, but the more powerful types can communicate with mortals through mirrors and pools...

Give out more potions that serve a utility function or last longer if used out of combat (the adrenaline and fast movement of combat processes them through your body faster). For example I am not likely to use a potion of climbing during combat but to get up to somewhere we need to...

If I were the optimistic type I'd say that this might mean that Wizards will do a better job of coordinating different aspects of the brand in order to capitalize on potential synergies (16 years since I worked in the corporate world and I still got the lingo down ;) ), so for example, a starter...

While I didn’t do a spread, I had players declare how many cards they planned to draw (0 to 3) and then I laid out that number face down before them like this: Player Declares then cuts the cards. Let’s say they declare 3. I lay out 1 and then put one aside “for the god of luck,” lay out...

So basically back to what Snarf originally described. 🤷🏽‍♂️

When/If I get a chance tonight I’ll share my opinions. But after using someone else’s deck as a reward the PCs were given a clue as to the location of another deck they might use to mitigate the negative effects of their first go round (or risk even worse results).

[double post]

I am out and about right now so can’t find the link but I did recently post about a version of the deck I made/used for one of my current games. My advice it to just decide on a number (like 22) and then just pick and choose what makes most sense for your game/setting/scenario/characters

I am out and about right now but I did recently post about a version of the deck I made/used for one of my current games. My advice it to just decide on a number (like 22) and then just pick and choose what makes most sense for your game/setting/scenario/characters.

I just want to state for the record that I would very happily try games run by either @hawkeyefan or @Maxperson

Just seeing an image of the Banana Splits starts to make me feel nauseated like I just realized someone had clandestinely dosed me with acid. I'm not kidding. They always gave me an oogy feeling as a kid - and on to today.

Middle School?! I had to have those memorized by 5th grade! It really is worth knowing, though. I credit playing D&D since I was 11 with my ability to do quick math in my head.

This explains why I struggled to use the laughing emoji as a response to Morrus's Bond opinion. ;):LOL:

Roger Moore. Bond is such an absurd and wacky concept that anyone who plays it straight fails and his approach seems to fit best. The Daniel Craig ones are the worst.

If that is your way of saying that thread is cursed. Then yeah, 💯

There are so many things I want to respond to in that thread, most of which are references to variations of the Kruger-Dunning Effect regarding evaluating your own play style and processes. But I won't.