Search results

I really find that part of their statement completely inexplicable. Like, who thought this was a good moment to lord themselves over their customers?

Huh! I hadn't even considered that, but that actually is a reasonable suspicion.

Well, that's just a heck of a sentence.

At this point, I’m going to wait to see the license before calling anything ‘satisfactory’.

"Second, you’re going to hear people say that they won, and we lost because making your voices heard forced us to change our plans. Those people will only be half right. They won—and so did we." ...wat?

Not to indulge in kremlinology, but it would be fascinating to know the discussions happening inside WotC today.

Totally! I’ll cheerlead for Chaosium any day; they actually listen to their customers.

Leaving aside their odd fixation with NFTs, Chaosium usually does right by their community.

"Paizo does not believe that the OGL 1.0a can be 'deauthorized,' ever. While we are prepared to argue that point in a court of law if need be, we don’t want to have to do that, and we know that many of our fellow publishers are not in a position to do so." Goddamn.

@Parmandur is someone I specifically enjoy interacting with on this forum, but man - as they themselves once said, that dude has an autocorrect that likes to party.

I dunno Darjr - stuff started getting real weird after Bowie passed. I'm not saying he was some kind of cosmic lynchpin, but here we are.

I’ll be the first to admit I didn’t have “Cory Doctorow and Neil Gaiman weigh in negatively on WotC” on my 2023 bingo card.

Agreed. I’m honestly shocked that they have no response - makes me wonder if no one of the people they approached agreed to the terms.

Just made Ars Technica, of all sites: Link.

Do people around here sleep!? /s. ;)

I originally didn’t think they would, but at this point I’d be surprised if the EFF didn’t weigh in at some point.

Matt Colville actually just announced on stream that MCDM is starting on their own game next week.