Search results

That's only true if you require them to be in the squares and you use the grid. So in that case, yes, that's correct, there is no difference. But I don't require strict orientation to the battle grid. I use the map as if there is no grid at all. That's the basis for everything I have stated.

Figures A, B, and C are located on the battle grid below with 1" squares. Their bases are 1" circular and fit inside the squares. (you have to work with me here a little and imagine the grid) ABX XCX XXX Erase the battle grid, like you suggested, and don't move the figures - imagine that...

On the battle map, two diagonally adjacent creatures are further apart than two creatures in adjacent squares by a distance of .414 of a square (2.07'), assuming they are exactly in their squares (I don't make figures conform to the squares in my game BTW). As DM, I'd allow a creature to...

Welcome to GURPS. That system uses 3d6, except lower is better. :) I really like this concept, making the average happen more often. The swingy d20 is really prevalent in 5e.

You have many options here, but one that comes to mind is offer to start a new campaign after you continue the current campaign for a little longer. You could also offer to start a new campaign under the condition that you will return to this one eventually, and possibly switch back and forth...

Hey everyone! Long time lurker, but decided to finally register so I can join in.