Search results

A Cleric to a trickste A Cleric to a trickster deity would embrace the chaos and randomness and just draw!

If no-one else is willing to run what you want to play there's only two remaining options: either you run it, or it doesn't get run at all. The potential long-term advantage if you run it is that maybe one or more of the players take to the game and decide to try running it themselves, which...

At the moment, perhaps; but if you allow that and then don't force an immediate card draw you're opening the door to abuse: they keep shuffling and casting divinations until they know a good card is on top, then draw before the Deck gets shuffled again. The solution, of course, is that while...

Correct. Divinations would not work on these things other than to maybe tell you their effects are or may be random and unpredictable...which, with a Deck, is probably already known info anyway. Identify will tell you it's a Wand of Wonder with 20-25 charges remaining, its command word is...

I think there's a difference between 'bad', where a DM is actively trying to hose the players or constantly repeats the same mistakes due to refusal or inability to learn, and 'poor' or 'inept' where a DM is earnestly trying but doesn't know the ropes well enough or keeps unintentionally...

And yet, when you get a whole table full of that guys it can produce one rockin' and entertaining game. I speak from experience on this one. :)

I do the percentile roll when they first try to learn each individual spell (except for those given by training), rather than go through the whole list when they reach that spell level. Thus, if you're a 6th level MU but have never tried to learn Identify before, you'd have never rolled d% for...

Portent is in UA I think. And yes, the whole point of the Deck is that nothing can tell you what you're about to draw. Even deities can't predict the future.

An inexperienced DM is ony bad if they don't or won't learn from mistakes made.

It has to be, otherwise Augury or even Portent would completely break it, never mind Commune. Yeah, here I'd have simply pointed out that the Deck's magic trumped your Phylactery just like it trumps any other divinations and stopped there.

IME it doesn't ignore the question at all. The DM hosts, and in the rare occasions where that's not true the game's either at a neutral site (e.g. university classroom or yacht club meeting room) or at someone else's house because they've specifically offered to host that session. You're...

They get to try. And I get to tell them to take off.

Perhaps Greyhawk wasn't the best example, then. My exposure to it has always been as a lower-magic somewhat gritty setting, as opposed to FR which is the higher-magic less-gritty one, which is why I put it as a contrast to magic-everywhere Eberron.

The Deck would trump the Phylactery were I ruling on it. The Phylactery can warn you of unfavourable alignment effects of intended deliberate (and maaaaaybe even unintended or accidental) actions on your part but can't warn you about something random: it has no way of knowing whether you'll...

If someone wants something that far different from what I'm already running then they can DM it. If I'm invited to play, I'll then accept or decline. Hypothetical: a player insists on Eberron as the setting but the DM has no use for the primary elements that make Eberron what it is and instead...

In my experience the DM also hosts, almost without exception other than one-offs.

Sure. A GM without players isn't going to have much of a game. But if the players collectively ask (or worse, demand) that the GM run something she flat-out doesn't want to run then IMO she's well within her rights to decline, which I think was the point being made in the post to which you...

That was a 3e thing, but may have come in late in 2e. What never made sense to me was the progression of curing spells: Cure Light at 1st, Cure Serious at 4th, Cure Critical at 5th, and Heal at 6th. Moving Cure Serious to 3rd makes it far more logical because the level gap between each tier of...

Training is one of the best ways to force characters to take some downtime - which they otherwise often would not - and interact with the setting in ways not necessarily related to adventuring. Broadens the scope of the campaign considerably.

Oh, absolutely. Just not as PC-playables, which is where the original point began.