My idea of fantasy includes Wish spells and portals with the potential to lead to every reality in existence.
So high heels are well within the possibilities, given the only real limits are my own imagination.
As someone that pulled an Amethyst dragon mimi, (I think from the Dragonlance* set), I approve this change.
Edit: actually, it was the Fizban's treasury set of minis.
Bland backgrounds and goofy faces have been around long before AI.
They are not features unique to AI.
Overly serious to overly comical sounds like range to me.
There are less details in the background monsters to show perspective.
As things get further away, you see less details. It’s a...
Having looked it up now, I see what you mean and why you thought of it.
Not sure if the DnD version maps exactly to the dyadic emotions, but it’s definitely the same concept.
I should have said 5E24, that’s my bad.
Ok my mind’s a bit mushy right now, so I might have to google ‘dyadic emotions’ later.
But for now, this is what I was talking about…
Previously in 5E14 they only had 4 or 5 emotions, I think.
I really like that Magenta is kind of a mystery. 🤯
I added one as an NPC (using the sidekick rules) I thought it would be easy, being just a few simple colour-coded emotions to express. I know the 24 rules added more colours/emotions. So, maybe that will help in future?
I still can't tell if you're arguing or agreeing, lol.
Just to clarify, do you think the Barbarian has to give up a complete round in order to end their rage under the new rules as per the OP interpretation?
The only reason I find that you think this looks like AI art is:
'Very bland background. Odd facial features'
Neither of these statements relate to the covers of the books in question or AI art, IMO.
Personally I look for too many fingers or weird blurring or clipping of images when trying to...