Search results

agreed, the original question was not limited to 2024 however but to 50 years of D&D agreed, but based on the ‘innovation means it needs to be something new, not just using parts that already existed’ even songs would not qualify, Based on that criteria, 99.9% of ‘innovations’ would not be...

or improve / change something existing by combining existing things in a new way (and adding some ideas of its own) Songs all use existing notes, does that mean there is no such thing as new music?

slightly more than two pages, but less than 10 rooms ;) https://www.gmbinder.com/share/-L_0WX-KKXsZA22VHr5j

yes, but that was not the question asked... is a far cry from 'perfectly match your tastes'

the fact that it was a single person, not 'people'?

so basically they do not want 2024 because it is the same and they do not want anything else because it is different and they need to learn new rules… sounds like you are stuck

I did not move to 2024 because it was just a minor iteration on 5e. A larger change would certainly have been more interesting so I would have checked it out at least

bards are bad, I wish they would be removed, wait, actually I wish I had a lot of money and bards would be removed

it is in German ;) (and it keeps going.. trillion, trilliarde, etc,)

not sure how groggy you have to be to go to a convention. I am not saying 1/3 having switched and 1/6 (if the numbers hold) mixing in 2024 are bad numbers for 2024, in fact I consider them pretty good. The point was that most of the people in the audience did not mix and match, contrary to what...

I only heard the podcast, but 1/3 moved entirely to 2024 and some portion stuck with 2014, which I assume is what the half here refers to (the podcast did not quantify it). Only a part was mixing, and going by those numbers a small minority (the smallest out of the three groups)

when why did half stick with 2014 and 1/3 move entirely to 2024?

but they have a different word for that, mill-ion, mill-iarde, bill-ion, bill-iarde, and so on, they would not call it 2100 millions, they would call it 2.1 milliarde

you should be able to trust that the numbers are correct or at least what Hasbro believes they are spin does not mean that they have to hide failing sales numbers and D&D is close to being shut down due to lack of sales, it simply means they portray it in the best light possible WotC is a...

unless you post it on their site and they like it enough to publish it ;) but yeah, boilerplate stuff, as bad as it is that this has become boilerplate…

um, no, it is 2.1 Billion, the Saudi Fund does not deal in single digit millions, and even if they did, that would be reported as 2.1 (or 2,1) million, not 2,100… Google also verifies that it were 2 Billion...

there is always a 'need' for spin as far as corporations are concerned

I mean, if you know it is spin, why would you trust it...

I assume the statement was about the core books, not adventures, etc.

probably not much, Hasbro has been notoriously bad at a clear communication, they obfuscate as much as they can get away with