Search results

I am not sure how that leads to the idea of punitive viking hat GMing, but okay.

That is a strange interpretation of what I said.

I love stuff like this. Not only does it show that the players are invested in the game, it gives me all kinds of opportunities to bring on the wandering monsters and rival adventuring groups. So you are going to make a hell of a racket and spend a week clearing out the copper piping? Cool. In...

Or it is a way of simply not actually integrating Goliaths into the setting. These FR books gave WotC an opportunity to make FR a fully current D&D setting snd it sounds like they squandered it. So not only do you not have a new setting, you don't have an old setting that actually reflects D&D...

Between this thread and the high level adventure thread i started, I want to make some stuff happen just to prove it can be done.

I guess that is one of the inherent benefits of xp for gold or other concrete, non-combat rewards. If it is worthwhile for players to farm random encounters for xp, they will.

See, in those situations, the juice isn't (or shouldn't be) worth the squeeze. You spend all this time and energy and (most importantly) noise shooting bats and all you have done is gain 7 XP and given me multiple encounter rolls. Congrats?

Yeah, that is definitely a thing, especially with modern D&D and similar.

Just to be clear, I am not arguing that you can't integrate dragonborn or tie flings or goliaths or whatever into FR or Eberron. I am just saying it would be easier and cooler to just build a setting that fundamentally incorporates all those things. I get that people like FR. Great. Yay. But...

I wonder, is this phrasing a way to "incorporate" them without doing any actual work? Seems like it. Again, the benefit of a setting written for the new core is that you don't have to do any of that. You can just create a world that accommodates and truly integrates all the core species and...

Nope, you're right, I scanned too quickly. Sorry about that. My only complaint in the original was that it did not mention it the first time, which can be troublesome.

If you are hand waving it, just be honest and level them by fiat. But this thread is about your preferences as a player.

This continues the mistake of not being clear about whether contact with a single Madoi awakens them all or just the one touched. Clarity is paramount in trap rooms.

RPGCon in Marlborough MA in April.

I don't necessarily disagree, but I find it revealing that no one has actually engaged with the idea of actually breaking down what 16th level character can do in order to examine how one might design encounters that engage those abilities. All we have gotten is people complaining about how it...

Return to Moria is on sale. Anyone play it? How is it?

What do you mean by this? I don't understand mixing milestone xp and individual awards. Isn't the point of milestone XP that everyone levels simultaneously?

Tangentially related: a regional con I am involved with is doing an honest to goodness tournament game using Shadowdark in the spring. I am super excited.

I really like the individual xp awards based on class from 2E. I mean, if I am being honest, I love most things about 2E. I just can't get anyone to play it.

I think fiat is required for the GM to control pacing.