Search results

We've run two one shots. People had fun and knew their character's abilities quickly. Otoh, still no foundry system and the dev has lost interest in the system so my other group hasn't looked at it. I doubt we'd ever switch full time, but I sure love a lot of what it does for players and GMs.

I'm very happy not working! But differences make the world go round.

Unexpected. But so many find it hard to retire.

I like that style because it gets rid of the opponent standing still while you chase them problem.

I'll find my version of this and put it on line.

I've extracted and filed every article from my PDFs. So much easier this way.

I'm not sure why you'd play those two games of you don't like combat. Others are free to disagree, just my thought.

Same.

What's the witch?

I generally agree.

We use a lot of different initiative systems. Both tables seem to like no initiative most of the time. PCs go when they want. I have enemies go between them, or when it seems to make sense. But I think this requires trust .... We've run a system similar to dagger heart, and the tension on if...

Yes. But if this is a preview to get us excited......

I like Dyson logos, but they need to give us great looking maps meant for VTT use. With color and STUFF.

I don't think I ever read version one in detail. So it all seems kind of new to me.

Intrigued

Having read about half it now ... I'm a real fan.

We must be reading different books, because it's not even close to the only trope .

Agreed. The only real away to differentiate them is in fluff, resource management, or what we allow them to cast. But it's all magic.

I'd be ok if it was just this, but I really like manipulation of space and time for them for some reason. No idea why. I also understand why people want body manipulation for the psion, and I'm all for it. But I won't miss it if it isn't there.

It appears I never read 1e in detail, I just now realized there are no rules for light/darkness/etc. Intrigued.