I normally assume that if we are at the point of talking about rules problems that the possible approximations have been considered and already rejected. If they were accepted then it wouldn’t be much of a rules problem anymore?
One might also suggest refluffing over outright houseruling...
Yes. I’m saying the number of reviews is ‘wrong’ aka not complete. We know this based on the numbers of reviews on dmg and mm. My guess is there is a time horizon where reviews older than X aren’t being shown.
We know PHB sales much better than MM and DMG. Always has, always will. So I don’t know why the numbers on amazon are that way, but I know they are wrong.
IMO it’s impossible to rate without some context around the rating. That might be other movies in general or other Superman movies or all entertainment. But implicitly you are rating it against something. Usually it’s the closest category that one possess enough high quality data points to...
One might suggest that prolific posters should get free perks at a minimum, or at least prolific posters who drive clicks and subs should as they are probably a net positive on the bottom line.