Search results

true yes, but unfortunately inapplicable if you ever want to deviate from those pre-existing settings into original ones or into anything your group isn't familiar with.

oh sweet christ can we stop with the edition warring already? i have little tolerance for it at the best of times and it's not even that relevant to the thread topic!

goblins and kobolds, and i'd like to see the return of a proper dryad plant person PC species.

i fall strongly on the side of character skill, you have your stats and your proficiencies or whatever their equivalents are in your game of choice for a reason, that's what they're for, Use Them, a player's chosen approach and method may influence their odds of success (or failure), even by a...

i don't know anything about Elric but i do agree 5e would benefit from a dedicated 'summoner' class.

autocorrect error?

the change to the thread name seems entirely unnecessary.

two things, maybe it's just me but: -i've always had a bit of an issue feeling like the druid is strung between it's two identities of being the shapeshifter and the nature caster and would be better off as just being two classes. -they've always been overly reluctant to share traits and...

even with all the later content i'd say 5e still struggles to offer a decent martial defender playstyle, oh sure you can have high AC or HP but the issue has always been making the enemies not walk straight past you.

nice break-down.

i don't hate the subclass vs second class decision but i do have to consider that between the various classes the subclasses were not created in equal importance.

it may be a few minor features at level 1, but you're still making them pick a massive part of the trajectory of their character in that single decision that they already have a ton of decisions to come to terms with is not a good excuse to heap another big one on them. it has zero impact on...

Okay, to clarify, i don’t think the concept behind multiclassing is bad and should be removed, being able to combine class archetypes and features, BUT i think the current incarnation of multiclassing is pretty terrible, classes have to be designed in consideration of the combinatorial potential...

i don't really care about getting my subclass features at 1st and understand and agree with the points made for delaying them to third but i do agree we should remove multiclassing and solve that separate issue ;)

If i was getting a noncaster ranger I’d like them to come with an extensive list of both active and passive tricks and perks ranging(heh) both mundane and supernatural that i can individually pick and choose to customise them like warlock invocations, and I’d especially like the option to have...

this promises to be an interesting topic.

i think i might be the polar opposite here, if i find a thing i like it's usually cool to me independently regardless of the lore, and if i find something i like i'm more that willing to repurpose it and put it into another place or setting. one of my biggest frustrations with warforged i've...