Search results

Well, if we don't talk about him, he comes back to bite us. I thought the truenamer was broken, and refused to believe it. So I min-maxed it a long time ago. I think it took level-appropriate magic items to buff the truenamer's attributes (and what class didn't have level-appropriate magic...

What does this have to do with DPR?! My bard, Lucius Flertsalotte, is currently king of DPR. His signature move is to kick open the tavern door and yank off his coif, letting his blond ringlets fall. At the bar he moans, "oh rapture! Oh woe! My sweet Brunhild is fled, ne'er again to be...

Missed opportunities. So are the truenamer and shadow caster like Bruno? We don't talk about them?

So that's your team we've been seeing in passing? We're trying to get a tarrasque metacarpal to build sustainable tiny homes. Wondering if we should aim lower. Like dice.

Why isn't this the Tomb Raider promotional pic?

Well, it looks like this one can do more pull-ups than Sophie T.

A book of Incarnum and Nine Swords would bump it up to .75 range.

Here I was, hoping for BLM's Ted Talk about awesome DMing. I guess a talking teddy bear show is almost as good.

Oh. That's easy. Just give them the Retainer Toad treatment. Them: "Yay! We took out the evil emperor!" Toad: "Great job! But the princess is in another castle! On to World 2-1!"

That's fine for a campaign. For a max-level progression, it's a bit fast for me. Could you vary the speed - go slow when the PCs don't need a power boost, then grant levels faster as they do their "gotta get fit" montage?

Just one. Summon Ned.

Coffee or scotch? Start placing triggers 30 feet away from traps. Or drop in a gorgon that petrifies within 20 feet.

Maybe get a "light" token for the source-bearer to stand on? Orange is a torch, white is Daylight, black is darkvision . . . The range doesn't matter much if no combatants are attacking at range. It's pretty sweet though to be the archer in the dark, aiming at the well-torch-lit frontliner...

This is a natural consequence when you implement Pro and Con in place of Succeed and Fail. Rolled a Con? Fail with opportunity OR succeed with complication. Failing alone is just . . . not interesting.

Somewhere in between. It seems weird that knowing your enemy and knowing the terrain grant special bonuses when they are already bonuses. "I know my enemy's weak spot." Great, hit him there. Do you really need a superiority system on top of that? My NPCs don't use morale, but when they hit...

Players gonna play. If you give them options, they won't choose any. If you "rollercoaster" them, they'll complain that they don't get options. The GM's job is much like that of a marine's: adapt and overcome. (Or is it improvise?) Analysis paralysis, or apathy are my first reactions...

A draft of sample skills and perks has formulated. I'll be using them to flesh out the sample NPC/PCs, so they'll also be used in the demo play session. The parentheses in the skills are for the type of contest that will typically benefit from the skill: Physical, Mental, or MetaPhysical...

This is simple and excellent. I might borrow it. What keeps two characters from jumping straight into the sack (burlap, of course)? Well, one or both sides have a few issues that must be resolved amicably before they become an item. And before long, there's a little adventurer on the way . . .

So it's an OSR? Hmm, maybe not - I don't think there were they/them-identifying behemoths in the old school.