Search results

Why are they a bad idea?

Well the 4e monsters actually did have incorrect math at the start. I also don’t think that the 2024 monsters are too samey for the most part. Though them having roles would not be a negative in my opinion.

I would say 2024 monsters are closer to 4e Monsters and can be pretty tactically interesting

Like Dark Sun, Forgotten Realms, and Greyhawk? Who have many famous powerful people.

Maybe explain instead of being vague about it.

The 2014 ones that are near identical or the newer ones?

You do know that Green Dragon didn’t even match the final version. I can’t get a good image of a green dragon vs old right now but here is the Black Dragons vs each other. Along with the Blue Dragons

The TTRPG is currently in a limited release period

Those were not problems it reviewed very well.

What are you referring to with this?

I think it just had poor timing on when it came out and who it competed with

Well Drizzt appears in an image, but doesn’t show up himself in any role.

D&D the franchise was undermonetized. They were not talking about the tabletop game itself. As shown by the fact that nothing like extra monetization of the game happened, while they released more of various other types of D&D products

Spelljammer was not disliked because of changes. It was disliked cause it was too short and didn’t give as much detail as it should have As for Dragonborn in Dark Sun pretty sure the same path as 4e makes sense, they are the Dray.

To answer the question, no cause all the books we got so far still involved them, so the effect of them leaving can’t be judged yet.

The FR gods are explicitly much more limited now and generally have to work through agents