Search results

The current player base is an order of magnitude or two larger than it has ever been. WotC could safely produce a lot more than they are currently.

That's not an adventure.

Added

I hear what you are saying, but it still seems weird given how much love the adventure gets.

Just for fun, I made a poll thread for speculation. https://www.enworld.org/threads/what-is-2026s-big-adventure.717745/

Just for fun I made a poll thread for speculation. D&D 5E (2024) - What Is 2026's Big Adventure

Just for fun I made a poll thread for speculation. https://www.enworld.org/threads/what-is-2026s-big-adventure.717745/

For my part, I am guessing Dark Sun as a slip case setting adventure combo.

Since we (almost) have confirmation that there will be a big adventure this year due to the Beadle & Grimm's Platinum Edition set to pre-order late Q2, I thought it would be fun to have a poll and see what people think it might be. I have included the options from the speculation I have seen in...

We have multiple, consistent studies that show that AI assistance increases capability at the time but causes a loss of capability when AI is taken away. Not just students, but actual doctors. This isn't telling at clouds about those lazy kids. It is a very serious problem.

Where in a given module does it say how many weekly sessions it is intended to last?

Perhaps ironically, the only campaign I thought felt like a true toolkit is also the worst actual module: Dragon Heist. It is full of great bits with which one can build a low level urban campaign. But it is a crap adventure.

Ah. Sorry. I thought you meant dice that were unlabeled.

I don't make the rules.

Out of curiosity, what do you intend to use those for?

I think you are conflating the Pathfinder Adventure Paths and the D&D Campaign Adventures. The latter have monster sections, but they don't really do what you are talking about. But the Pathfinder ones do. I just looked at Avernus as a reference and its info on important characters is disjointed...

Thanks!

See, as long as they balance length with actually having something to say, I like YT because I can work, game prep or do other thing while listening to such stuff. I can't read an article and do anything else with that time.

Anything is possible, but I have my doubts that anyone would notice the difference between a 300 page novel meant to be read in an afternoon whether it was written by a person or AI. The medium in that case is not intended to be savored or deeply appreciated. it is mental potato chips to begin with.

Which part? There are some very vocal anti-GenAI folks, of course, but given the absolute ubiquity of AI use among the younger generation, I don't see any reason to believe GenAI in games is going to keep them away.