Search results

Not exactly the same, but I have elves generally living and looking fairly “ageless” for about 3 centuries, and then fairly rapidly descending into senescence and death. An elf that actually looks old is probably less than a decade from dying. In my settings though, elves, dwarves, and humans...

It’s a shame, so many Bothans died to bring us this thread.

Agreed. Even as an active 4e lover, I do think that was one of the edition's weak points.

I also have active antipathy towards criticism centered around "plot holes". I view the show as more of a pure spectacle, so I'm not sure what themes Season 1 evoked that the remaining seasons didn't.

Exactly. In terms of how important "logical plot" is, the show is somewhere between a typical D&D session and an episode of the A-Team. :)

Not being overly concerned with that kind of "logical stuff" is very much part of the '80s media the show is emulating.

My personal ranking from favorite to least favorite is 3,1,5,4,2. 4 had the epic Max/Kate Bush scene, of course, but so much of the Eleven/Henry backstory portion I felt dragged.

Nah. Each season drop was a mini-event in and of itself, and the season 5 drop was the closest thing we get to a water-cooler event in our fragmented culture. Those moments are worth more than the actual show itself.

Stranger Things is a bit like D&D; there are quite a few different flavors, and the one you love is almost certainly the one someone else hates.

It had a mall!

This is why I'm so glad I insulate myself from the online echo chamber of media criticism. 3 was easily my favorite season, and I really liked the season 5 ending. It wasn't quite as good as the first half of season 5, which was fantastic, but very enjoyable.

I have the quote above on T-shirt. It is, by far, the shirt I own that has gotten the most confused questions, even from complete strangers.

There are two kinds of people: 1) Those who can extrapolate from an incomplete data set.

Come on guys, we just had this thread a few weeks ago! :)

I'm aware of that, I'm simply criticizing that mindset.

I was definitely thinking of Frieren for a lot of these points.

So don't dislike something as trivial as a race in an RPG! The move away from viewing the rules as a pure GURPSian toolkit to build a setting, and towards presenting the game as oriented around the D&D multiverse, with individual games being local variations of that milieu, is also an...

The point is it to make sure you understand how you should try. You're never going to be able to portray, certainly in a TTRPG context, a truly nonhuman perspective. From that standpoint, all characters are "humans in funny suits". So the trick is to grasp on what aspect of the nonhuman...

But that's the point. All stories, from the perspective of a character, are human stories, because we lack the language to communicate actual non-human concepts. We can tell stories "about" non-humans, but we can't actually communicate a true non-human perspective. Any stories about...

In Reddit parlance, that's an "everyone sucks here" situation. Players shouldn't actively try to be disruptive. GMs shouldn't hold on to their aesthetic preferences so tightly.