Search results

It's also worth noting that a lot of "fans" of a given property don't actually like any specific version, but a Platonic Ideal of it. Topic at hand: if the Dark Sun 5e book was literally word for word the 2e version reprinted, there would still be fans who complained they weren't getting...

Oh adventures should be interesting in both definitions, but I don't consider the interesting part gambling during char gen for a playable character. But that's not what this thread is about. Carry on.

You realize the Chinese phrase "May you live in interesting times" is a curse, right?

You can play Doom on a TI-83 graphing calculator. That doesn't make it a gaming console nor the best way to experience Doom. But humans are nothing if not resourceful and if all you have is D&D shaped hammer, every fantasy setting under the sun looks like a nail.

Sounds like opinions presented as facts.

I would care if someone said "let's play Axis and Allies and then busts out a Clue board, Monopoly tokens and the Pop-O-Matic™️ bubble and said how flexible the rules to A&A are.

My problem is that D&D was never as modular as people thought it was (it's nearly impossible to change the magic system without effectively rewriting the game) and the only reason earlier D&D was modifiable was because it was never well balanced to begin with. I don't feel D&D is any more...

Which to me is like changing the rules to Axis and Allies because all you have is a Clue board.

I mean, if you got buy in from your players, you could limit character options to only Lawful Good human fighters and say you are running Camelot. But realistically I question why you are using D&D at that point.

Let me help: https://share.google/pmIzV3KVUiohedgyv

Irony so thick you can cut it with a knife.

I ran the module that they gave in the box set and got the above results. Today I'd rather run something like Stokerverse than try to adapt D&D to 1890s Earth, unless I was going full urban fantasy steampunk with it.

You ever Play a green book campaign? A campaign where everyone (player and NPC) is essentially a human fighter? You might get a Thief and if you're lucky a crippled mage character who can use 10 noncombat spells total? Ymmv, but my experience was it wasn't very good and the green books (hell 2e...

I brought up how old TSR settings can include mechanics that were intentionally designed to screw over players. Somehow that morphed into settings being internally consistent and that's why players can't play a Tortle blood mage but DMs can add kappa hemomancer NPCs if he wants.

Something funny @Alzrius ?

I find the biggest hypocritical element DMs who champion limitations as a vessel of creativity make is that they often find reasons to limit what players can play, but so not likewise limit what they can use as far as monsters and magic. Lots of DMs find it perfectly acceptable to ban the race...

Though it does beg the question if your setting is so different than the games core concept that you are omitting large chunks of the PHB, are you using the best system? I often think people bend and twist D&D into other game systems for no other reason than to claim they are still playing D&D...

And Eberrron was created by WotC in third edition, when the design paradigm had changed from "beating PCs into submission" to "lets offer cool alternatives that are tied to the world." No, what I'm suggesting is things that are universal systems that improve characters, not reduce them. Stuff...

I mean, yeah. There is no point to playing any game you don't like. I wouldn't play Edge of the Empire if WEG d6 is my favorite Star Wars. The market is so full of D&D clones,d20 games, and inspired by games (for nearly every edition) that if you don't like WotCs current brew, find one you...

Yeah, but how often does that work in reverse? You make things easier for players? Add new options without taking something away? Make abilities and spells more powerful? In 2e, I think the only setting that added more than it removed was Faerun and people used to call it a munchkin's paradise.