Search results

That's the biggest hit against Gryphon Hill; it was written before the Ravenloft setting was a thing and unlike I6, is very hard to retcon into the setting (classic or modern) because it breaks so many fundamental setting rules. As a historical document, it's fascinating. As a general module...

On a related note, B&G is doing an anniversary edition of Tyranny of Dragons "updated" to 2024. From what I read, they are just reformatting the stat blocks and using 2024 versions when applicable, no actual changes to the content.

This thread has made me glad Enworld doesn't give relationship advice.

When the player requests this And you offer this. If you can't see why some people would not take that seriously, I don't know what to tell you...

I didn't specify that it would be the same world for that reason. That said, unless you explored every continent, all the under dark and everything in between, the odds of never encountering a new species (be it humanoid, animal, plant or monster) is decent. We still find undiscovered plants and...

Why do you? So what? You're avoiding saying the obvious. You have no system to handle a disagreement but to have everyone agree with you. Enjoyable tyranny is still tyranny. Hopefully, they understand that and agree that what you want is the most important thing and are fine with indulging your...

This works for a while, the "always a bigger fish" scenario, but if the fish gets too big you get the Forgotten Realms "well, why aren't THEY saving the world?!" Problem. Its one thing to be intimidated by a high level adventure when your third level, but that breaks down when your ninth and you...

This is the heart of the matter. Do all your players align 100% to your tastes and preferences? Of course not. So what happens when you align 95% of the way? What is done to cover that gap? The answer repeatedly has been "the DM wins, the player loses". The DM gets 100% of what they want, the...

There are two problems scenario in game that I've seen play out. Protecting a World that Hates and Fears Them: In such a scenario where the locals find adventurer's a threat, players tend to respond in kind. That is, a merchant who overcharges becomes the target for the group's thief. The...

Sorry, I trimmed out all the irrelevant tangents. I find it funny that you responded EzekielRaiden's post about the idea of the DM owing something to his players with "players are expendable, I have a wait list." This is the most Post-Capitalist mindset I can imagine. "I don't have to take care...

Honestly, if the player is already IN THE HOUSE when he drops the world-specific restrictions on the player, then yes. It was a total failure on the DM's part to not give the player the full info in the WEEK between pitch and first game. The player was expecting bog-standard 2014 D&D with the...

Not here to re-litigate the ASI thing, just pointing out that with Species (like alignment) having less mechanical impact, people are more likely to go with vibes rather than mechanics, which leads people to wanting to play a tiefling because they are red (or blue) devil people, rather than...

On the other hand, species decoupled from ASI has opened up people to try species they wouldn't have tried before. Especially for combos that would have been non-viable or even banned (things like minotaur druids to pick a nonreptilian example). Species has mostly become about aesthetics (with...

I'm honestly shocked that I've yet to hear anyone say "Of course the DM doesn't get everything every time" and "sometimes a DM has to pick his battles." Or even the famous quote from M. Jagger "you can't always get what you want, but sometimes you get what you need "

Why does the DM always and the Players usually? The implication is that in a conflict of wants, the DM wins all disputes. There is never a situation where the DM says "I didn't want this, but it made my player happy so I will sacrifice a little of my happiness to make them happy?" Is getting 95%...

Not the suggestion I was making. I'm not suggesting disruptive. I'm suggesting something you may have distaste for, but everyone else would at best not care about (like the species of another character). It lowers your enjoyment, buts its not a game-breaker. But its still treated like anything...

I agree its not zero sum gain, but it seems that if something would lower the enjoyment of the DM by any degree, even if it raises the enjoyment of a player, that is an unacceptable term. If you could measure fun in units, the DM must always be a maximum fun and will not lower his fun to raise...

Surely, but the issue keeps coming down to your happiness seems to trump anyone else's.