Search results

The text seems to mean that SOAK dice are removed directly from damage dice. A 4d6+3 damage dice soaked by a 2d6 armor would result only in 2d6+3 damage to be rolled, if I got it correctly.

I totally understand your point, although I personally prefer having a big, very beefy but complete release than having several subprojects to collect (I need to remind where's what, etc). Which is also why I'm waiting patiently for the full volume containing all MOARs ;)

I know the drawback of course, but I understood that having all possible O(n^2) combinations is something the author is actually pursuing. If you want, it's a bit the course of class based systems: either you are quite rigid and only allow specific combinations, or you need to cover a lot of...

Awesome, I absolutely love the idea of having multiclass feats for every possible combination of classes! The Tome of Character Options would be an insta-buy or insta-pledge for me! Good to know too. If there's little overlap each book will have its own merits.

Great! Also, is something similar on the horizon for the Thematic Toolkits?

Hey @timespike , I remember time ago you mentioned creating a collection with all issues of MOARs (IIRC after all 5 were released). Have you released it?

The letter says that if you're holding a spell focus you can perform seen components. It doesn't mention material components in general. Since a spell focus only replaces mundane components (without a gp price), you may not cast spells with an expensive material component this way. In this sense...

Both of these descriptions seem to support my decision: if you can perform seen components, you can use material components as well.

Thanks for the summary, it shows there's contradicting stuff like being able to cast V,S,M but not V,S. For me, I'll replace M with S and call it a day.

There's just so much to love... Leading Throw can mean a monster gets thrown off a cliff, in a pit, in a hazardous terrain, in a spell's area, etc, without further saves. This also means that a monster can try to desperately leave a hazardous terrain only to be thrown back in during its own...

If this is what you're aiming for, I'd totally allow it

Congratulations for this fantastic result! Really happy to see the A5E ecosystem grow both from official and third party contributions! Now I'll have some reading to do!!!

Backed as well!

Time ago I made a quite in depth comparison between the different strongholds. While it's true that often rural strongholds are more expensive than the equivalent building strongholds, the fact is that often you can get them for a lower quality, meaning that they can become significantly...

Glad to help! :)

@Morrus I gave it a good read. Overall the draft is solid, although of course there are a few typos or stuff that may be clarified. If anything, the section that might need more work is the one related to monsters, where several entries refer to rules not present in this starter set. More...

I think you basically have two options: either you turn CHI into some other attribute that may be useful to your campaign (attributes are also open ended in WOIN, you could have HONOR or something similar as described in some EONS article), or you could just replace the CHI increases from those...

Sure, will gladly do ;)

Even if it's just a draft, I think it captures a good portion of this awesome magic system while still being way less complex. It's probably a very good way to get players started and excited about building their own spells on the spot! I'll be curious to see how the next iterations evolve...