Search results

There is reason to have them, though. Reason 1: They grant spells to their clerics. Reason 2: They meddle in mortal affairs. Reason 3: They feud amongst one another. Reason 4: They embody aspects of life and reality(love, wind, etc.). Those reasons can be explained through other reasons and...

"Just remember what ol' Jack Burton does when the earth quakes, and the poison arrows fall from the sky, and the pillars of Heaven shake. Yeah, Jack Burton just looks that big ol' storm right square in the eye and he says, "Give me your best shot, pal. I can take it." And then HR got involved.

No, no. "What has it got in its nasty little pocketses?" "Bless us and splash us, my preciouss!" And then HR got involved.

The Aftermath. The story of the Mandalorians in the months after the purge. The first episode could start with the purge itself.

Could be High Republic. :p

Luke: "Your thoughts betray you, father. I feel the good in you, the conflict." Vader: "And now HR is involved."

Or when the War of the Roses broke out.

"I find your lack of faith disturbing. And now HR is involved."

"Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. And now HR is involved."

What if you allowed bonus actions to be used as actions, but the same bonus action can't be used more than once in a turn?

Judging by the state of the world, not many are capable of receiving it. :(

Soft on your nose?

33 under Talk With Your DM.

Yes, it's how I view dragons and dragon blood. And I'm fully capable of imagining anything. It's not about being able to imagine a justification for weak dragonborn. It's that such justifications fall short of how I view dragons. The game is Dungeons and Dragons. I've always felt that...

Tortles I don't give a fig about. Dragonborn are different, because of what they are. The blood of dragons wouldn't be so weak and pathetic that dragonborn would be on par with humans, elves, and halflings. Accordingly, I increased their power level significantly, so they are no longer an...

No. That's not the real argument. The real argument isn't nearly that extreme for most of us DMs.

Dislike is a range. And no, it's not utter disgust. Disgust is a different word. Metagaming isn't allowed in my game. I dislike it the point where it has a major impact on my fun playing the game. I don't find it disgusting in the slightest. You've dialed it up to 10 again. If it's...

Because you're focused on the wrong thing. It's not about the specific race in discussions like these. Dragonborn are like the quantum ogre. The problem with the quantum ogre isn't that it's an ogre, so changing it to a quantum pixie isn't going to change anything. Same with the troll and...

1) you don't play in his game, so why would he ban them. 2) It actually has to rise to the level of having a negative impact on your enjoyment of the game. 3) If it does rise to that level, I question your choice of games in the first place. D&D has been human centric from it's start until this...