Search results

we at paradigm concepts looked into pricing for box sets.... trust me, they are making almost nothing on the new into box.. heck, at 20 bucks they may be simply braking even...

That's the DM's fault.. Social encounters can be as dangerous as any combat encounter... hell, they can be worse. Aspects/traits/bonds/whatever SHOULD get the players in trouble, when used right create complications which can not always be defeated with a sword. Reward those choices, reward...

Go all FATE with them..... come up with some fate point system where the players can gain points if they follow their quirks/flaw/ect. Not hard to do.. If 5e is open I fully intend to write up a system with an expanded flaws system and put that puppy up on RPG now. :P

You should try doing both... I commonly do the same "big picture" story but I make sure to seed the campaign with subplots that take place along side the main story. Subplots are inspired by personality quirks, don't fight them.. use them, weave them into the story... side adventures now...

Anyone heard any news about the future "OGLness" of D&D 5.0?

> Season 15: Murder in Baldur's Gate (available in stores in print) > Season 16: Legacy of the Crystal Shard (available in stores in print) Can I get these though Amazon or some such?

Is there a way to get the previous encounter seasons? are they available on the WotC website?

1st edition had spells such as Extension and Ray's Numatic Enhancer meta-magic has been around a very long time

Source or it didn't happen.... Again, source or it didn't happen.... and yes, I think you are talking out of your butt here, I have seen zero evidence of what you have stated.. link or it never happened

Oh please, like this never happened in 3e/Pathfinder everyone took the same feats if they wanted to be Archery Monkey.. or a Trip Money.. or so on.. players will build the same thing with smaller feats

Not quite, he was the original wizard... but someone how, along the way, wizards became only spell casters without a lick of martial training.

I see it as a chance to play a Gandof like spell caster who carries a long-sword and knows how to use it!!! << just watched Return of the King last night

And the fighter gets more attacks per round and will have more tricks

Gives you a huge hug

Except it's not... I can tell you the announcement of a new addition KILLS sales of the older addition. we (paradigm concepts) where selling spell decks in the 3.0 days.. sales where amazingly good... the day they announced 3.5 our sales plummeted. same thing took place with Witch Hunter...

Umm because people are playing using the free playtest rules.. why buy a book when you can join the playtest?

well except the fighter does not have to fall back to a magic items to do there job, they can swing that sword all day.. 3 times a round (or 4) at higher levels... and they are still a fighter the wizard runs out of spells, and is suddenly not a wizard.. they are a 2nd class melee character...

Sadrik if you think they are dealing more damage then a fighter with a weapon, your not reading the same packet I'm reading... yes it can deal some nice damage, but a fighter will out damage a cantrip every round. Giving them something to fall back on is a good idea, unless you WANT to see them...

your 100% correct

Not at all because that fighter will get three attacks at his full attack bonus, adding his attribute damage to each one... and if he takes the two weapon fighting style, he will get 4 attacks at his full attribute bonus... that's +20 +weapon die +4 times more of a crit chance (if he takes...