Search results

Well yeah. The point of a boycott is “stop giving them money,” not “your possessions are tainted.”

Also, why exactly are we sealioning in JK Rowling’s defense here…?

Sure, fine, but compared to smart glass? Absolutely not. The environmental cost of extracting and processing those minerals is significantly worse. Everything not made from animals or plants was mined from the ground. All production and all consumption carries environmental costs. If one...

Both of which are explicitly discussed in the opening post. And you’re claiming smart glass is better for the environment? Pull the other one.

Is that a thing people do anywhere…?

Huh? Every post in the thread has been directly related to the topic in the opening post… Why wouldn’t paper be legal and why would Meta glasses be better…?

It’s all nonsense. Define “true neutral” in whatever way makes sense to you for your games and there shouldn’t be any problem.

Absolutely. I wish more of the people who call themselves allies shared that outlook. The number of people I considered friends who still bought the stupid video game was truly depressing. And then to add insult to injury they all ended up complaining the game was bad like a week later.

I chose the phrase foreseeable future intentionally. It still could happen some day, but it isn’t currently on the horizon. Nor am I, but I would boycott M:tG or D&D if WotC did a Harry Potter tie-in for either product.

Totally reasonable, and like I said, I support that decision. I was just trying to see if there was something else more specific I had missed. Anyway, I appreciate your commitment.

Sure, and if it was just about potential sales, that would make a Harry Potter set seem pretty likely. But they would also have to rebuild the staff who make the cash cow. And, again, they said they wouldn’t in response to this announcement. Like, if you want to argue that a possible future...

A Harry Potter M:tG set is absolutely not happening in the foreseeable future, and I would put real money on that. First of all WotC tweeted shortly after this announcement that M:tG already has a magic school setting and they currently have no plans of releasing any sets tied to another. If...

I support this decision, but I’m unaware of what relationship D&D Beyond has with her? I know Hazbro included Harry Potter in a list of upcoming partnerships, which I suppose might be reason enough not to want to support Wizards of the Coast. But is there any specific information connecting this...

I agree, I strongly prefer my D&D be analogue. I’ll use my laptop for notes and stuff, but the physicality and tactility of the game is a major part of its charm. That’s why so many players get way into collecting dice and minis for their characters. They’re physical artifacts that reify the...

Faerie is the border between the material plane and all other planes. Where faerie is closest to the material plane it reflects the latter geographically (though much like you said, everything is “more”), but the deeper you go, the more it begins to deviate from the material. It’s like if you...

Full-speed movement while grappling is really, really strong. DMs, don’t set any fights on cliffs if any of your players take this feat.

People seem to be pretty ok with it in this thread, but I’m with OP on this one. The 2024 Grappler feat is very strong, and on monks in particular it’s insane. We can quibble all day as to what constitutes being “mandatory,” but I would say playing a monk and not taking Grappler is suboptimal.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, that’s obviously just a normal little girl.

Well yeah, it was pre-covid. That’s a major world event that I think very reasonably marks an era transition.

I was trying to make a joke, but evidently it didn’t land. You are absolutely correct though.