Search results

it’s a line, not a prison. People can cross over that line, I am not expecting most of them to do so however

even if they could be capable of that, it doesn’t make them good people, they thoroughly stay in the bad camp Just because there is a spectrum does not mean you cannot draw a line through it and divide it into good on one side and bad on the other, it’s just that some of the bad are worse than...

if that is what they are suing over, good luck with that...

huh, what lawsuit, what are they suing over?

so just end the story at level 8 or 10 instead of dragging it on to 12 or 14 (in a second book). The adventure will probably benefit from that anyway

it would have been released after the 2024 core books I assume. It’s basically saying there has not been an AP in a while To a degree there also seems to be a hope that it would be better than the more recent ones (Phandelver Below, etc)

AP stands for adventure path, so you understood it correctly. Not sure what is misleading about something you understand. An adventure is something shorter than an AP. The stuff in the anthologies are adventures, Rime of the Frostmaiden or Curse of Strahd are APs, to distinguish them from 16...

no idea, but I don’t think APs sell bad and settings or anthologies sell much better, so the ‘WotC can make more money by hosting 3pp products than by creating APs themselves’ is either nonsense or can be applied to other non-core releases as well (i.e. a new Xanathar or an updated MotM). If it...

and they realized this now, right after hiring a bunch of people?

not sure how popular that actually was, it just happened to be included with the basic set. Everyone who got Strahd actually wanted it. Chances are Strahd sold more copies too

that feels more like a non-sequitur. How does the popularity of the 5e domains compare to the 2e ones sounds more like a comparison that would make sense. I don’t think the 2e ones were all that great, the 5e ones would benefit from more content however. VRG only has a few pages for each, a FR...

it’s still the most popular 5e adventure, and probably most popular D&D adventure in the 50 years the game existed

not that you needed to…

I hope they stick to releasing the two book format for a setting once a year for the foreseeable future. Ravenloft and Dragonlance next, in no particular order. After that, throw in a new one or expand Radiant Citadel, after that, revisit Planescape, Spelljammer, or FR, repeat

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/glasscannonunplugged/diablo-the-roleplaying-game just putting it out there ;)

third no slipcase, either one book with a bit of setting, like Dragonlance, or (my preference) two books like the FR ones. The second one would be an AP, there are not enough regions to make gazetteers for

no, it’s that players are not entitled to run roughshod over the GM either. Everyone will have to try to accommodate the others, and if that fails, then one of the two is out

it was always about something negatively impacting the enjoyment of the game, from the very start. It’s just that we do not repeat that mouthful every time and use a shorthand like ‘dislike’

are you a player in my game? Humans might be the one exception, given that we all are human, but as far as I am concerned any fantasy race is up for grabs / exclusion if your dislike is strong enough, no different than slavery, etc.

and in the absence of those, we discussed things and agreed to not include them. They have been formalized for the more common things, that doesn’t mean there is nothing left to discuss I don’t see it as particularly controversial to not include things people dislike either, but apparently if...