Search results

Keep on with the good work, to make sure that when the machines take over, we at least can play the one good version of D&D! XD

Jonathan Tweet was the lead designer of D&D 3E and not involved in 4E so what he says has absolutly no relevance either and its clear that he does like his baby better. Also the Art in 4E looks like Magic the Gathering art. As in it has the same artists and same artstyle. Again this may look...

Why do we at this point take anything which mearls said about original D&D 4E serious? He was NOT part of the original design team. He was just not there at all. He joined 9+ months later and NOT as a gamedesigner but as a tester/developer that was only later He is the most hated designer...

I am not 100% sure what you are looking for exactly but things that 5E did worse than editions before: Power scaling being all over the place. In D&D 3.5 you would double in power every 2 levels (at least that was the plan). So 1 CRX enemy could be replaced with 2 CRX-2 enemies. In 4E the...

This guide, like most of the "optimization guide" are way too narrow minded. And just focus on white room numerical optimization often. Just as an example: Arkhoisan Fang student can be used with the Great Sword. Which is one of only 2 +3 proficency 2 handed military weapons. The other one...

Well if you cant imagine something, then this for me is at least partial on you. We are playing role playing games, which are about trying to imagine a different world. If there is some world which you cant imagine because it is too different to what you are used to, then you can try to...

Well GTA 5 sold more than Call of Duty. List of best-selling video games - Wikipedia And Final Fantasy 14 nowadays has most likely similar player numbers as WoW if not more...

Yes of course it is survivorship bias. Saying that exactly the users are here which Morrus wants is not realistic. Also just because 1 human does want something, does not make this the right or good thing.

https://talkai.info/chat/ Ask "How could AI be used to improve forums." Anwer 1: Content Moderation: AI algorithms can automatically detect and filter inappropriate content, spam, or abusive language, helping to maintain a respectful environment. Machine learning models can learn from past...

Why not? If AI could be better than you, then why should you not want it? As I learned in my job "you should never be afraid to hire someone who is better than you."

You can sell this technology later to other forums. I am sure you easily find investors for this. And else ask the community to pay for the AI mods, as I already suggested. Also these AIs dont need to be able to do as much as a general AI they are specialized. They just need to close threads...

More than happy to. If you use an AI which can write posts for me I am all in. Please feel free to make an TigrisAI bot and let it run in this forum and we can vote on their comments and mine to compare. I am all for progress.

But this is just survivor bias. Yes the people who are still hear like the mods. Or at least find them bearable. But you dont know how many people never made an account because they saw aggressive moderator behaviour, or which left because moderators were to slow (because they need sleep and...

Why? There are 100s of examples where feelings make people behave illogical and inconsistent. Even just the fact that lawyers are paid by hour makes in average processes take longer etc. and as I said we can test it. Let the human moderators fight against the AI ones to prove that they are...

No thats the point. They dont have thoughts. Thats what I find ideal. I dont think thoughts are useful when it comes to laws and rules. It should purely be about logic. We see how bad the Law Systems are in a lot of countries because of the "thoughts" etc.

Well if the beaty standard is that skintone X is more beautiful, then the AI is not wrong. I mean diferent countries have different preferences. For example in Europe not being in the sun was really popular in the past, until Sissy changed that. Nowadays being "sunbathed" is considered more...

Well the people on forums and what they write is the content and the customers. So keeping them happy and posting as much useful stuff as possible (to sell the data to AI companies) and visiting the site as often as possible (to looking at advertisement to generate money) should be the prime...

We said the same thing about many things before. And it got proven wrong time and time again. If this forum is one of the first, they might even be able to sell the data from their AI mods to other forums.

Well no, over time when they learn what the community likes, it will be mathematically for sure be more fair. "I feel" is just a fear about the unknown. Computers replaced humans in many places already. And will in more in the comming years. And as I wrote above we can test it. Just kick...

Well we could try both at the same time. And people could upvote and downvote mods when they see them. And the worst X mods get removed after Y months. Maybe thats humans maybe thats some AIs. This way we could test what is better and how people in general like it.