Search results

I like debates, actually. Everyone feel free.

I think the Phase weapon enhancement makes all your attacks treat enemies as flat-footed. Possibly wonrg, based on it's exact wording.

You should take Crossbow Sniper - Feat - D&D Toolshop as a feat as soon as possible. It's in Player's Handbook 2.

I meant if you rolled what would result in a 4, a 3, +1.

That's perfect, thanks! Do you know if any of the other Planar Golems are statted out? I don't see them there.

Actually, now that I think about it the first sentence of Empower Spell, "All variable, numeric effects of an empowered spell are increased by one-half" implies that you could get more summoned creatures. If you can summon, say, 1d4+1 creatures, for example, and roll a 4, you get 6 creatures. I...

I was just flipping through MM3, and saw the entry, and I love the idea of a Gear Golem (and Mechanus in general) but none of the Planar Golems are statted out. Anyone know where I can find the Gear Golem?

There isn't a way to get more creatures from one spell slot, but Rapid Spell will let you put out two of the spells per turn. Rapid Summoning from UA is good too, and Master Specialist furthers the effects in conjunction. Basically, there are only ways to use more spells per turn, not summon...

Stealing this idea.

Make a plant version of the sentient/living construct type, or whatever the warforged are called.

Of course I'm right, I'm always right!

I would imagine the Warforged domain in Faiths of Eberron has it.

I agree, that IS the way fun should be had, where everyone gets there time to shine. In fact, my whole point is that physical stats should be given less of a priority specifically to give them a break against the already overpowered casters.

Not even WotC made the classes balanced, actually. They have been quoted as intentionally making certain options more powerful than others. Also, not only will it kill the fighter at 20th, but it can also avoid getting hit, erasing the need for a meleer, and a healer, and cast spells that allow...

If the treelings can adapt to other social environments, then you should include a more unusual and specific reason as to why this is. So far, what I see, based on physiology, is a race with a tough bark-like skin, and sturdy structure. There is nothing indicating to me that this race should be...

But that's missing my point. Yes, races will gravitate towards certain classes, but the problem is that melee classes are generally weaker, yet racial score bonuses make it harder to have bonuses to scores that melee combat.

If the player can provide a source, I allow anything within reason, barring infinite loops and such crap.

I considered the high likelihood that it's a trap, yes.

DMG, pg. 173.

But it's not, it's nerfing physical stats. The general guideline is too "balance" a physical stat bonus with 2 mental stat penalties. It makes physical stat bonuses more costly.