Search results

Proof Ordered! In a few weeks I'll have it in my hot little hands!

Oops wrong thread!

That was pretty much my thought process, yeah. I knew A5e updated "Studded Leather" to "Leather Brigandine" which is what it -actually- is, and saw Hauberk and went "That's a chain shirt!" and left it at that. Though, in fairness to EN Publishing: The chain shirt people imagine was never a...

You are correct! I am a fool!

The goofy grin on my face the entire way through reading this... I'm so happy you and your group enjoyed the adventure! That's everything we hoped for!

Dying When a creature is reduced to 0hp they gain the dying condition. While dying you are prone, and your movement speed becomes 5ft. While dying you cannot take actions, bonus actions, or reactions and must make a death saving throw at the end of each of your turns. Any creature can move...

Yeeeeah. I think a shocking number of us have stories like that.

... did you read the first 9 words of that line and then stop? 'Cause that is what the rest of that paragraph is talking about.

The post you're referencing was in direct response to the idea that "Life isn't fair" gets the response "Deal with it." It went outside the bounds of discussing the game, and highlighted Lanefan's philosophy, which I characterized as "Mean". Trying to pull that back into game theory and ask if...

All the problems in the world encapsulated in a single sentence! "We should make things better than they are, now!" "No!" I get that it probably makes you feel rugged and individualistic and heroic or whatever... but it just comes across as being mean.

The idea of "Dungeon as Encounter" or "Dungeon as Boss" isn't "Megadungeon". It's "The dungeon itself, independent of the enemies scattered around it, should consume player resources." There should be traps, doors that are hard to pick, pits and gaps so wide someone needs to cast Fly or the...

RIGHT?! Which is why Mearls is saying this kinda stuff. He's away from the constraints of WotC and is doing what he can. Not always gonna be the best, but at least he's admitted to WotC making mistakes and oversights in the game design itself. The NPCs are designed like 4e monsters, player...

Yeah, well, I'm built different, I guess! While you're happy to have one of your players sitting around on their cell phone or whatever for an hour or so while everyone else at the friend group hangout we built is having fun in a group activity, I'm trying to make sure everyone at the part is...

Ehhh... I disagree. For starters: If I cast Hold Person on you and you get a saving throw at the start of your turn to resist it for that turn, at least it's still -active- on you, rather than being immediately resisted and ignored as if I hadn't cast it, a wasted turn and concentration. So...

Oh, nah. For me it's about changing some spells and cutting others. It's not "Tradition is Bad!" it's "Tradition can occasionally lead to ignoring better design choices in favor of just maintaining momentum" Control spells aren't the issue, it's their implementation being tied to a rigorous...

The spell list -really- needs to have a lot of the tradition cut out of it... but. I don't think control spells are the real issue, there, so much as the structure of them being -so- stridently carried over from previous editions. Take "Hold Person" as an example. You've got a long duration...

This license gives Wizards the power to: 1) Publish your posts online. 2) Authorize other people to quote your posts. 3) Publish your posts relating to other copyrighted works (such as references to Tunnels and Trolls and their game mechanics) 4) Host profile pictures for you to attach to your...