Search results

What, really?? Like, an actual physical model moved one frame at a time? If so, mad respect!

The art style is definitely amazing, and I'd be lying if I said it wasn't a major factor in my grabbing this. I haven't had a chance to play this yet. I'm afraid the lethality of it (more with the monsters) may make it unpalatable for my group.

It’s possible that the “Look Up” doesn’t refer to flying, but hope. As in, here’s a hero to look up to. But I have no info outside of this teaser.

It's sort of ironic: if people hadn't been so triggered by a milquetoast and practically boilerplate disclaimer in a preface celebrating Gygax's work, I wouldn't have heard half of this. But the more they fight to defend any perceived stain, the more examples come out. Instead of admitting...

You know, it just hit me, with the ‘product of his times’ stuff. I grew up in the 70’s…I guess this means I’ve been way less sexist than I could get away with? I mean, obviously I don’t get to be as sexist as someone as old as Gygax, but surely I should get to be way more sexist than those in...

Disagreeing with their meaning? On these very boards, he posted that, due to their biology, women’s brains weren’t capable of enjoying games on the same level as men. Much earlier in his career, he was quoted as saying women “ruined war games and war gamers”. Tell us again how we are missing...

We’ve had at least two full threads pointing out specifics. In insane detail. If that wasn’t enough proof, then I don’t know what is. Edit: and every time something is directly posted, the response is “he was joking”, “it’s out of context”, or “it was the 70’s and everyone was just as sexist!”

It makes no difference if what he wrote was sexist or not by the standards of his time. What matters, is that what he wrote was sexist by the standards of our time. And that is literally all the foreward is saying.

If you’re trying to say “go woke, go broke”, I think that completes my BINGO card…

The whole ‘Product of their time!’ defence seems really strange in this circumstance. That’s all this disclaimer is basically saying: “Here’s some historic documents we think are important enough to publish, but be warned they are a product of their time…”. “Product of their time” seems to be...

Holy cow, your campaign must have a prodigious death rate! The games only been out for a little over two months!

Hey. If it's one random pilot that we've seen before, whatever. I was talking about if it's plot was somehow tied into all the other shows. As opposed to it being random kids having a random adventure somewhere in the galaxy. I mean, if it's a good show, I'll watch it no matter what. But the...

Ah. That's fine, then. The comment above that says it ties in with the Mandalorian finale had me confused.

I'm actually sad to hear it's going to tie into The Mandalorian story arc. I was really enjoying the idea that this was going to be it's own thing for once. It's not like the galaxy isn't big enough...not all stories need to intersect :(.

I still have them on my shelf. I haven’t read them in a long while though, might be time to pull them out again.

I'm more excited by this than by any of their past Star Wars shows recently. Maybe because it's feels like they're finally doing something different with the setting.

That was my reading as well. It only looked like a trance because she seemed unaware of having done it. But that’s apparently how sigils work…even the caster is affected.

While I don't doubt there are artists who aren't interested in fame, as you say, I'd be very surprised if there were many not interested in attracting additional clients. Getting official credit is usually critical for working artists.

Crediting the artists who worked on your project would be a normal expectation, I would imagine. And would go a long way to reassuring people. The fact you aren't crediting the artists specifically would be a warning sign for me, regardless of the existence of AI.

It definitely did.