Search results

And you know his favorites.... how?

DOWN VOTES ARE 3 PLEASE COPY AND PASTE Banshee 24 Bodak 12 Bone Naga 20 Boneclaw 20 Crawling Claw 6 Death Knight 21 Death Tyrant 16-3=13 Continuing the fight against lameness! Deathlock 12 Demilich 21 Dracolich 21 Eidolon 21 Flameskull 14 Ghast 18 Ghost 22 Ghoul 20 Lich 18 Mind Flayer Lich 18...

Whew... almost missed this window! Vote now so I can come back in an hour and vote! Banshee 26 Bodak 12 Bone Naga 20 Boneclaw 19 Crawling Claw 6 Death Knight 20 Death Tyrant 18-3=15 Still incredibly lame... Deathlock 14+1=15 Kind of cool. Sure. Demilich 21 Dracolich 20 Eidolon 21 Flameskull 14...

I'll check it more later, but I found it interesting. I've been looking at different ways to do a spell-less Ranger as recently as last night, so I'm very excited to see what you do with the herbalist abilities. My solution was to remove the Ranger class, then use the Rogue Scout subclass...

DOWN VOTES ARE 3 PLEASE COPY AND PASTE Banshee 22 Bodak 20+1= 21 In honor of Anton Yelchin and the much underrated fun flick, Odd Thomas... (and yes, I know those were different​ bodachs, but still!) Bone Naga 20 Boneclaw 21 Crawling Claw 18 Death Knight 23 Death Tyrant 20-3= 17 Still a...

This one caught my eye. As an alternative, I thought of this... "When you use Inspiration on an attack roll against an Undead or Fiend creature, the damage of that attack becomes Radiant." I have a homebrew feat called 'Unfettered' that looks almost exactly like this, except without the class...

DOWNVOTES ARE 3. PLEASE COPY AND PASTE. Allip 17 Banshee 24 Beholder Zombie 20-3= 17 Because Beholders are lame, and undead lame things are even more lame... Bodak 20 Bone Naga 20 Boneclaw 21 Crawling Claw 21 Death Knight 22 Death Tyrant 20 Deathlock 20 Demilich 22 Dracolich 21 Eidolon 21...

Hardly a reasonable comparison, since you are now adding to/embellishing your argument with not one, but two rare magic items that just happen to be perfect for the thief. So we'll remove +2 from that to make it +18 vs. +13. So the skill monkey - whose schtick entails him being an expert at...

Alexander, Lloyd 7+1=8 LeGuin, Ursula 15 McKillip, Patricia 5-2=3 Pratchett, Terry 10

Alexander, Lloyd 8+1=9 Jemisin, N.K. 1-2= Out! About time! LeGuin, Ursula 22 McKillip, Patricia 8 Pratchett, Terry 20

Alexander, Lloyd 17+1=18 Jemisin, N.K. 10-2=8 LeGuin, Ursula 24 McKillip, Patricia 9 Pratchett, Terry 16 Wolfe, Gene 8

Alexander, Lloyd 21+1=22Cook, Glen 3 Jemisin, N.K. 14-2=12 LeGuin, Ursula 20 McKillip, Patricia 11 Pratchett, Terry 15 Wolfe, Gene 15

Aaaand my point is proven.

You are pretty determined yourself! I fully agree with you, but you do realize you are just banging your head on the wall at this point, right? As you said, iserith is simply going to ignore all of the many times throughout this thread that his position has been disproved.

Alexander, Lloyd 22 Cook, Glen 19 Jemisin, N.K. 13-2=11 Kay, Guy Gavriel 6+1=7 LeGuin, Ursula 23 McKillip, Patricia 15 Pratchett, Terry 14 Wolfe, Gene 15

I think you can get Phandelver online as a PDF (it's been a while since I looked, so I could be wrong). A good choice without getting the kiddie version of the Starter Set. Otherwise, Goodman Games is definitely available.

If you don't go with Phandelver, I'll second Goodman Games. I like their 5th Edition Fantasy stuff.

Alexander, Lloyd 19+1=20 Cook, Glen 24 Jemisin, N.K. 11-2=9 Kay, Guy Gavriel 16 LeGuin, Ursula 22 Lynch, Scott 11 McKillip, Patricia 16 Pratchett, Terry 16 Wolfe, Gene 20

And to be fair, I'd rather have people spite-quit than constantly spite-vote and argue about it. Look how much all of the bickering and spite-voting drug on and sucked the fun out of the previous Survivor thread. At least in this one everyone seems to be having a pretty good time, personal...

The more I think on this, I do think that perhaps a middle-ground solution could be to simply remove the +2 ASI, but leave the rest as is. To wit: Feats either offer Something, or +1 and something. The alternative is +1/+1. With this method, gaining +2 to a stat demands two ASI opportunities...