Search results

I am curious how large that segment of the population actually is.

I think I have decided to rule out the cleric. The difference over the first 2 actions at level 5 is potentially ~50 damage for the sea druid using a single slot and single channel divinity and ~35 for the light cleric doing the same. The earlier levels look nice too. That just leaves Sea...

That's a cool combo, i'm probably getting warcaster first since spellcaster with concentration spells wanting to be in melee can be rough. But for later it's definitely a top consideration.

which cold caster feat?

Assuming the prompt engineer is hitting run on the prompt then he is doing something fundamentally different than the recipe writer who simply writes a recipe and does nothing more. You seem to be assuming, AI produces single image, prompt engineer accepts that image. However, the more common...

@Zardnaar and whoever else, I will be rolling up a new PC after a recent party wipe. I've got 3 primary contenders. Starting at level 1. I've not played a 2024 Sorcerer or Cleric yet. I did play a moon druid early during 2024 (moonbeam was OP) and i've also abused goodberry quite a bit...

Even at +4d8, with 2 attacks no advantage it's probably only putting you in solid damage dealing territory compared to martials. You really need 3+ attacks and/or advantage with it, and even then other spells are probably better in most situations. I think t4 it's alot better as it gives a...

The context is always relevant. No I didn't. I defined what digital art is, the only thing LLM's can actually produce, which is the key context of this whole discussion. Like why the heck does it matter if art is also painting a physical paint brush on a physical canvas? Why does that have...

My biggest questions: 1. What happens later in the campaign if a PC dies? 2. 5e typically makes it much harder for a PC to die, so alternatively, what happens if the player doesn't really like the character he is stuck with for a year long campaign and he never gets to roll a new one? And...

No.

Rude.

Yes, and posts have context. The context of my post was first and foremost comparing LLM 'art' with similar people created art. As such only the digital definition needs to be applied. For the kinds of art my definition is meant to apply to, it is very useful and absolutely correct...

There's one thing here I don't get. What's the difference in using google, finding a website with a definition for a term and pasting that into enworld vs using chat gpt, getting a definition for a term and pasting that into enworld?

Well see, I thought it was obvious I intentionally used a specific and narrower definition of art that was limited to the kinds of things an LLM can actually produce so that the conversation could stay apples vs apples. So score your rhetorical points, just know they don't reflect my argument...

It's not often we agree, but the right to know what you are buying is one I 100% agree with.

Really? That's your takeaway?

I don't think so. No. A chef is not a machine. There's a few degrees here to walk through. I get a frozen TV dinner and heat it up in the microwave. Did I make the dinner? Did the microwave? Did the frozen TV dinner company? (It depends on what 'make' means.) My colloquial use of...

I think such an expansive definition of 'plagiarism' can be used to call virtually every human created art plagiarism, as all human art today is derived from previous human art. That's why many don't find such an argument persuasive. Yet, you describing something doesn't normally mean your...

Define ‘creating’? Because to me what I described is the act of creation and ai as a tool.

Do you think someone can imagine a particular image and prompt an ai repeatedly until it produces exactly what they are imagining? (I do). And if thats possible, even for one single person and one single image, then isn’t that the human creative process at work and not the ai?