Search results

I just realized I havn't finished the details on the summoning and boosting Powers yet for Ralziir. I'll get those done tonight and tomorrow.

Fighting against the last two foes, Shamash attacks the wolfrider again, his weapon glowing silver and leaving a shining trail through the air as the goblin's mount spins to the side*. The wolf follows up with a snarl and a lunge at the prone paladin, but he manages to get his shield up in...

Anyone else notice how much the Kensei Encounter Attack sucks? It's only very slightly more powerful than Sure Strike ... which is a level 1 at-will attack.

Plate isn't the best mundane armor in the game. Scale is.

Did Talas let anyone know about the discrepancy between the bas-relief and reality?

The problems I have with skill challenges and forced participation are twofold: One, Immeral isn't a social character. It would, in the most literal sense, Out Of Character for him to get into a protracted social "challenge" of most sorts, at least at the present time; that's why I had him...

Once it's reduced to dust, you can dump the dust into the ocean (or scatter it into the wind or...) and it becomes effectively impossible to retrieve in order to Stone to Flesh. Short of Wish, of course, which renders this entire exercise irrelevant anyhow. I mean, sure, if you used a precise...

How is a +2 feat bonus "clearly better" than a +3 feat bonus?

If you think Power Attack, Enlarged Dragon Breath, or Eladrin Soldier are examples of strong feats... well, let's just say that your priorities are utterly different from the majority of players. Those are about the three crappiest feats in the game.

It works fine. You focus on the multitarget damage and status effect definitions of controller, and leave the terrain destruction to wizards. The problem with Ranger-as-Controller is that Drizzt is absolutely a Striker.

Low-light vision for a feat is pretty strong.

I understand Slow from a Defender. What I don't understand is a power that inflicts Stunned and Immobilized (save ends both). Stunned creatures are already immobilized by virtue of being unable to act.

Yeah, one for bows and one for crossbows.

Try building a physical ranged attacking character (ranger or rogue). There aren't even any Epic feats applicable to ranged weapons.

They don't mean Battlefield Archer paragon path, they mean the Archery Ranger subpath in the Ranger class itself. Aside from the paragon path entry requirement, you're far better off taking the TWF benefits.

"As you will." Immeral says with a shrug at Phillian. "I will be at the edge of town." His eyes flick to Mirna and seem almost apologetic for a moment, then he turns to leave.Sorry, Redclaw, but it's not in Immeral's character to get into a protracted argument over something as irrelevant as...

When was the last time you ever got into a fight with a grell? When was the last time you ever even saw (or heard of) a Berbalang? Seriously... what the hell is a Berbalang and where's my centaurs?

Archer's Glory effectively doubles the number of action points you get even if you take the most conservative approach. I have no idea why people want to break it by having it triple the number of action points you get.

No. Weapon: is always its own header, regardless of what type of bonus you get for wielding that weapon. It would, indeed, need to be "Effect: None" to be internally consistent. Not that internal consistency seems to have been a design goal of the Classes section of the PHB.

Read the description of the armor. It's intentionally better. Only two classes in the game come with scale proficiency (both Defenders); everyone else needs a feat to use it properly, and that feat carries some pretty irritating stat requirements for most builds.