Search results

I just read it and assumed ;)

But I’m able to read this?

Probably. Someone earlier had a good real world example but it’s not quite what we are talking about. I wont try to cite it as I won’t be able to do justice to it. It would make a good jumping off point though. Maybe when I get to computer instead of phone I will try to locate it. I think the...

I didn’t go frame by frame. My guess is that such a rendering was in the first few frames after it turned on as it was transitioning between off and on. If it does exist at all as a frame it’s also not something visually perceptible in the real time view.

That’s fair, I feel like max has given some quite detailed processes, but I guess it depends on precisely what details you want to see.

Whats worse, nothing that looks like that actual image can be found in the actual video.

I think the issue with this assessment is no one is saying it’s simply a ruler or other tool.l in all cases. Many use cases of ai image creation are obviously not and agreed by all to be not tool-like. But that also doesn’t mean that every use case is not tool-like. What others are suggesting...

No idea how that first image was found or created but if you watch the actual video referenced above in real time that’s not at all what the character looked like with DLSS5 on.

So you’re saying they are similar enough to both be animals? ;)

I see the issue. That’s not a logically tenable position.

Create does not equal creative.

For that particular question sure. But it does bring up a foundational consideration. Artistic intent of the original artists in video games has never been sacrosanct. Since thats true, how can the justification for disliking DLSS5 be that it impacts artistic intent? It just doesn’t make...

Just wanted to highlight… All of this is irrelevant as whether its use by an artist changes artistic intent or becomes the artistic intent.

Besides a ton of pc gamers use mods to modify and/or enhance graphics. They literally are changing the artists intent and no one has ever given a damn.

Assuming they were to begin with why not? If I take a photo I took and apply a filter to change how it looks, I’m still the photographer. That ruling is not in all contexts.

Okay. The person using it can though.

This seems like it’s meant for a different thread?

Right. I’m with you on the particular artistic intent argument. My understanding is the developer is responsible for even enabling the feature as an option.

I think technically you are correct. But I also think that while the line isn’t clear and agreed upon, it seems DLSS5 crosses the line for alot of people, though how much of that is due to ‘AI Bad’ reactions, compared to the actual output of the technology I’m not actually sure.

Yes. In those examples there is an actual different creator, another person, an artist creating the art. Though this can quickly approach partnership and colloborative work depending on how involved the patron/benefactor is. Are you fully ready to accept all the consequences of claiming the ai...