Search results

Hmm...here are my predictions. Dragonborn - +2str, +2cha or +2con Half-elf - +2cha, +2 any other stat Eladrin - +2int, +2dex or +2cha Elf - +2dex, +2wis or +2int Dwarf - +2con, +2wis or +2str Human - +2 to any 2 stats Tiefling - +2cha, +2dex or +2int Hafling - +2dex, +2wis or +2cha

And I applaud him for not giving in to that temptation and continuing to use his magic to augment his roguish capabilities. :D

So he's effectively a gestalt rogue8/sorc8? I would say cr6 as well. Classed npcs tend to be weaker than their cr would otherwise indicate. A human rogue8 is clearly weaker than a babau (cr6), so cr5 for him seems about right. I am not sure how much tougher the sorc part should make him. Your...

A somewhat more unorthodox tank might consist of a wizard who uses summoned monsters to disable the foes. For example, at 5th lv, your wizard can bring in a huge centipede, which should be able to grapple and thus disable any foe on the battlefield, making it more "tankish" than a fighter can...

For most part, the people here are quite civil and a real pleasure to converse with, so I don't see a need to change anything. But with Blizzard, I think their forums are beyond salvation. :uhoh:

In all fairness, he said "not enough of a market", not "no market". I don't deny there are bound to be able of your age bracket playing dnd, but that doesn't necessarily mean there are all that many of you, and I doubt they can break even just by appealing to the few of you. Wotc needs to...

I don't think there are enough rules confusions yet to merit a rules compendium. Even in the 3.5 version, the bulk of it was a reprinting/reclassification of the rules, with the odd errata sneaked in here and there. And they still didn't clarify whether the hydra attacks with all its heads on...

It's funny, I seem to get more classroom management tips out of dnd forums than teacher training colleges. ;)

If it is not too much trouble, you can try scanning his character sheet and uploading here. We can try looking through it and help you spot anything amiss, or at least let you know more about the viability/power lv of said build. :)

Gah! Shouldn't you be in North Korea? :blush:

Too weak, IMO, since I would probably be better off taking quicken spell, improved metamagicx3, improved spell capacity and quickening half of my spells. And it would use up fewer than 9 epic feats. :] The original ELH version is quite fine as is, IMO.

I think it is quite a bold move to break away from the standardized way classes are acquiring new powers now. I can also foresee some interesting balance conundrums, eg: Is getting more/better encounter powers worth giving up all your dailies? Will it be like the warlock vs wizard problem in 3.5?

I have never heard of such a feat before? What does it do roughly?

I suppose it would be too much to expect an all-daily-powers class some time in the future? :p

There is the beastmaster in complete adventurer and beast heart adept found in dungeonscape. Dungeonscape Excerpts

Someone needs to run an encounter involving 8 orcus minions and provide a report, together with screenshots. ;)

The fighter won't be accomplishing much beyond a -2 attack penalty though.

And I thought my 6-hour session for Risk: Godstorm was long...:o

My objections stems from what I perceive as an attempt to bring logic and physics into a discussion where those 2 were never meant to apply in the first place. As mentioned earlier, the zephyr dance maneuver describes you as spinning gracefully away from an enemy's attack, yet you are allowed...

Technically, you don't get hp added retroactively when your con improves. But then again, it is just a pet peeve I have with the use of the "retroactively", rather than its intent. :p