Search results

Well I'm 35 years old and don't buy paper books anymore, I read everything in my ipad.

I got it as a preview and I really like the eldritch knight.

I got it as apreview and I really like the eldritch knight.

Well I don't buy physical book anymore so to me is digital or nothing.

well I made many flawless missions in the old and the new xcom games, it isn´t that dificult. But there were deads, many NPCs death (ths PCs weren´t rookies, they were elite ex military so they could command lesser troops) and some pcs deaths too, every player had at least one backup character.

I did it with savage worlds too, Everyone started as a military background seasoned character and had at least one backup character, it was very fun.

Every D&D book is in large torrents site. All content of D&D insider is on the internet, there is no DRM to prevent this, DRM will only hurt people how pay for the content. To me is pdf or no buy, I read everything in my ipad nowadays.

PDF is much more important to me. I like open things, but I think that d&d can do just fine beeing closed.

I´m more interested in 13th age, but anything is more interesting that the retroclone that is dnd "next".

To me is pdfs or no buy, I play and DM RPG only with my iPAD or a notebook.

Poor fighter, the wizard have spells that only then can cast, the clerics miracles, the thief backstab... the fighter is "better" in things that everyone can do... it isn´t like you need dedication to fight with a sword.

I would like a mix of it all to tell the truth, I love encounter powers and I love stances. I don´t really like critical hit things because they aren´t in players control.

This wizard can´t cast in armor is another of "let the wizard be powerful but hard to play" thing that I dislike from older d&d. To me the 4e solution is perfect, they simply needs feats to use armor.

I agree 100% with this, it would be much better than the current rules.

It is clear that tradition is more important than every other thing in the 5e design, don´t expect a better rule only because it is better, it would be changes for changes sake :-D

I really liked the rumour that the abilities bonus were score - 10, this way all abilities would have a passive (full score) and a active (the bonus) to use easily. They even take out the defences that could be used for this, each abilities should have a passive/defence score.

This modularity thing will be a mess, it makes everything more complicated, it is the oposite that I like in a RPG....

You can disagree but to me the only thing that would save the realms is a total reboot, pick up what is good, ignore what isn't.

Nostalgia and tradition, like 70% of what is seen in the playtest document.

I think that the problem with the playtest rulers is that the dice matters too much, d20 is too randon and the numbers are too low. It would be better if the bonus were abillity - 10 and/or if 3d6 or 2d10 were used instead the d20.