Search results

A) I'd use the Standard to move the mount away and let the player dismount as a move action. This doesn't nerf the dominate effect and allows the player to dismount. B) Since you're dazed and limited to the one action, you can take 1 action or command your mount to perform one action. C)...

Yes. Since they're movement is linked, if one is immobilized so is the other. The rider could dismount from an immobilized mount. No. What other effects do you have questions about?

For those that think you can DC a new target every round and never engage a target it may help to understand how DC came to include the engage part. Prerelease DC did not have the "engage" requirement and in play testing one of the most effective tactics for a paladin was to challenge a target...

If you need everything in that black and white clarity you're going to be asking a lot of questions and using your own interpretations. This game isn't that clear and assumes a moderate ability to read english and think.

Could make them 2 shot mooks. Sometimes I've done that instead of doubling the number.

It depends on how the power is worded. You obviously need LoE to effect someone, but there are powers that can only target or effect "each enemy/creature you can see", which requires both LoS and LoE.

Thats one of the advantages to a turn based system without time limits. In our regular game most of us play D&D for tactics than role-playing. For heavy role-playing we switch games.

No, those are written as powers and not properties. Sadly, the FAQ seems to indicate you can apply a weapons property to implement powers. We don't allow it in our group.

Stealth: At the end of a move action. So, no. Stealth is part of a move action, not an attack action.

RAW doesn't say that. It should be the case to keep AC progression consistent but it is technically possible to have +6 non masterwork armor, which should only show up if your DM is a @1$&.

Note quite true. Invigorating now adds to the TMP gained. Originally they stacked but was quickly erratad.

Nope. Then you haven't been looking here and, certainly not, on WoTC Forums since PHB2 came out. It has been asked several times and brought up in other threads as well. The rules are permissive based saying "you can do x" not "you can't do x". If you're okay with all conjurations being...

I think that's why most people play it as being summoned anywhere but can't move vertically (fly) except to follow terrain.

The rules say yes. Heck, you don't even have to be wielding the implement to get the properties/bonuses as the FAQ points out.

Surely they would have mentioned somewere that spirits can fly if that was the intent. Don't mix fluff text with rules. "The mole/worm spirit burrows beneath your allies, keeping watchful wiskers/sensative skin altert for hidden enemies..." doesn't allow your spirit to avoid attacks or be...

...

True, still can't fly though. After all, it's no weirder than a landshark (fin sticking out of the ground and a shark jumps out of the ground to bite you or a Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube spirit that dances/flails around at random). In about all of the previous threads regarding...

RAW - The the player can take free actions. RAI - No. Domination represents control over another creatures actions and their fight to resist (this is why you only get to choose one action). I let dominated creatures use free actions that grant saving throws.

Nope. Phasing allows them to move through you, not you to move through them.

Saying "These are minions, you don't really need to worry about them and they're easy targets for you to get your THP and other powers that trigger when you drop an enemy." is wrong . Where's the fun in that fight?