Search results

You're replying to a post from last year. Since that post they came out with a revised monk, and it's widely popular. You should check it out. But warning, it's more complicated that it looks on first read. Many found the didn't really see the ramifications of this version until they actually...

Sounds like it.

Nothing you just said has anything to do with this topic. If you want to discuss the OGL, find another thread (like the currently active thread about that OGL issue, which isn't this thread). They have an active, actually profitable licensing agreement with WizKids, not a passive agreement like...

There is a great movie in theaters right now (Fall Guy) experiencing the same thing the D&D movie experienced. It's been happening for years now since the pandemic. People see like 3 movies a year now where they used to see 10, and unless a movie looks likely to make someone's top 3 based on...

I don't see what this has to do with IP or the OGL issue. WizKids already has a license for the IP in this format. They might clear the topic of "Warrior from this cover." I don't think we have anything telling us it was more specific than that, or anything telling us they usually get more...

Always bet on bureaucracy being the reason things are slow and not quite right. It's a very safe bet, provided you fill out form 438a-1 (2023).

We think. There is zero insider information on that question. If they view it like I do, they didn't care and gave blanket sign-off provided nothing is nude. I can absolutely see them saying, "You've always done good by us we trust you to make something cool" and that was all the sign-off they...

Outrage expands to fit the time until the next outrage. Sort of like a junk in the junk drawer always expands to fill the drawer, until you add more junk to it and find there is always more room for more junk in the junk drawer.

Just when you think people can't get more serious and over the top about what is ultimately a truly silly topic to begin with, someone proves you can always get more serious and over the top. I look forward to the epic debate over whether the dragon is really a red dragon, or was an orange...

Whatever it was, it was classic Internet over the top attention seeking "My tribe is better than your tribe" stuff over a silly topic. And I agree with your general view on this topic, but take it down a notch Francis. Not liking this change does not make one an incel, or bigoted or sexist -...

Naw man you called people dissenting from your view (about a silly topic) incels. You were not just speaking in metaphor you used intentionally bombastic language to get a reaction and are now acting the wounded victim that you got the reaction you were going for.

There is no good reason to call people names (incel) or wish death/disability on them (coronary) simply because they disagree with you about what the gender of an action figure based on an old painting should be. Come on man, you gotta do better than that, that's not appropriate.

There is evidence the model posing for that painting was male.

I much prefer this silly argument than some of the other silly arguments.

I agree. This was earlier days of 5e, and I had a DM who remembered it well, and I played my bard to the hilt to constantly role play those traits and flaws, and then avidly cheered for any other players who did the same or did something super cool in the game. If you have anyone at the table...

My first bard, I played it like a Warlord. I would hand people my inspiration d20 (I think people forgot the Inspiration rules allow the player to give someone else their inspiration, thus freeing up your single Inspiration slot to be able to get another*). I would hand people my d4 for...

If there is something in the CC which you can publish under the CC, the terms of the CC say you can publish it into another license provided you follow their attribution requirements. The OGL (not the SRD - the OGL) doesn't have any bar, as far as I know, in publishing your CC content into the...

Don't tone police me after you repeatedly rudely called what I was saying nonsense for no reason. The word you're looking for is "sorry" here, not doubling down on rudeness. You don't need it to be public domain, CC allows you to re-license into more restrictive licenses like the OGL under it's...

From the CC license, "All CC licenses are non-exclusive: creators and owners can enter into additional, different licensing arrangements for the same material at any time (often referred to as “dual-licensing” or “multi-licensing”). " I can think of no reason why you cannot publish under the...