Search results

honestly you add in some more charisma/int based manuevers and I think the battlemaster is a solid Warlord Chassis.

Yeah the trick with 4e "roles", is that while the rules state each class has a role, in reality the classes often had a minor "secondary role" baked in. The fighter was a Defender/Striker for example. Yes defending was its main thing....but it could still bring the pain.

Yeah this one might go from sci-fi to sci-fantasy pretty fast. So we have already determined that she is in fact "hearing" frequencies, they even noted the frequencies where her hearing picked it up. There should be no reason they couldn't use another sound recorder in the same frequency range...

Exactly. Templates are a fine start but like any monster design has to be put through a litmus test. This is one showcase where the damage is simply beyond what is reasonable for that CR, and so an adjustment should be made.

Just a reminder all, this is a "+" thread. Starting to feel a little hostile in here.

Yeah I have to agree. Once you brass tax it I'm not seeing much that you couldn't do with a Battlemaster who is not so dependent on charisma. The only thing that is "wow" about the gladiator is the stagger at lvl 10, which to me is the most powerful ability by far in a normal party. Your...

In a single monster I agree...but you can with multiple models. to your point from earlier, 4e's solo wasn't a one size fits all. Different solos approached the problem in different ways. Some split into multiple monsters, some gave you a bloodied immediate action, some gave you multiple turns...

It was more common in later 4e monsters to have monsters go at initiative 20, 10, etc. Now often these monsters could only do a standard action at that initiative (not a minor), but you still got the notion of the monster going multiple times in a round. I actually just looked back at a few...

Agreed. I have wondered what was the thinking shifting from 4e solo design to 5e legendary monster system, as I agree it seems like such an easy idea to have the monster go at multiple initiatives. did they find it was too complex, the monsters too powerful, they were just really trying to go...

So 66 pages deep, thought I would finally jump in with my short list. Overall, 5e is a pretty good system, "everyone's 2nd favorite" as they say. So I think any attempts to "go radical" or likely to be met with failure. So we need to look at some key areas. Monster Design While the player side...

It does it at the cost of extra rules and more things to keep track of though. That was ultimately my player's feedback after our A5e game, they didn't think the new layer of rules added enough "oomph" to warrant it (which was surprising as even my more crunchy oriented players thought the...

Why do 1950s cars still pop up in movies? because they are stylish!

Or....maybe documentaries don't work 200 years from now like they do today?

This would be like the CEO of Apple using a samsung phone as their main phone, and when asked "oh I still use my iphone for my email checking all the time....I just the samsung for the majority of my apps". Daggerheart was promoted to be a more narrative focused type of dnd like RPG that would...

I actually think at this point its less true Hubris and more the issue of competition. Its the same problem with weapons. Once one nation has a certain class of weapon that can beat another, that second country HAS to get their hands on it. If they don't, they are saying that Nation A could take...

Imagine a world where everyone has weapons as you say. And you don't have any guns or anything....but your the Flash (aka the comicbook super hero). Who would win? The trick with AI is the speed. By the time you have even concieved the thought of doing something, an advanced AI could already...

https://www.enworld.org/threads/manuevers-1st-level-winners-and-losers.684423/ https://www.enworld.org/threads/maneuvers-2nd-and-3rd-level-winners-and-losers.684698/ https://www.enworld.org/threads/maneuvers-4th-and-5th-tier-winners-and-losers.684715/ You took me down memory lane with this...

I mean....would it? At the end of the day crit range is not actually all that great to increase your damage, and your giving up all of the other various stances you could have active instead. That's a big oppurtunity cost. It would certainly be good, but OP.....eh I doubt it.

So just finishing up a little project where I had an AI generate a python script to create dozens of iterations of a boardgame map I am considering, as well as perform a regression analysis of all of the cards in the game to see if there are any power outliers. And...it did pretty darn well...

Even us mid level managers can be accused of that. When your focused on something its just easier to ask a question than go check on something yourself. The Q&A takes 10 secs, going yourself could take 5-10 minutes. Man probably makes like 100 million a minute...so that is some valuable time!