Search results

I really like the idea of making Sharwyn and co. loyal to Gulthias, thats an awesome idea. I think I might give that a go. I've also adapted Meepo for the adventure so that he can be more useful to the party making him an expert with handle animal maxed out and wild empathy as a class feature...

Hahahahaha! LOVE the chaser. Come ON! It was great :) I cant see anyone taking offense to that. Thanks heaps for the link, Hairfoot!

I am currently running this adventure as part of the 3.0 path, and have to agree that its not a bad adventure at all; with a few tweaks here and there, its awesome. I really like the first level of the citadel, but I have to agree that the second level seems a bit ordinary. I'm very keen to...

Covenant of the Blessed Trinity

I guess I can see how this might get frustrating, but seriously, learn to relax! Probably makes her anxious knowing she has everybody there just WAITING for her to make a mistake. Absolutely I'm still lauging at this!

Hahahaha. Damn, your players are so asking for it. At the risk of sounding like an adversarial DM, I'd seriously consider giving the PCs what they want - and that sounds like what they want is their rear ends served on a plate. If it were me, I'd now design an encounter where I could pull out...

Sounds great. Good way to grab the player's attention straight off the bat. As to whether the characters will ever use the spell again, i think 'too bad.' the spell description specifically mentions that it is a danger, and if players are going to assume that the DM wont catch themout on one of...

Awesome. That was enjoyable just to read.

Yeah, I suspected as much. So if a character has been getting RAW treasure carreer long, and decides to build and maintain a stronghold using the Stronghold Builder's Guidebook, the character is likely to be very underpowered?

Ohhhhhh...ummm 'yeah...'. So.... *Furiously scribbles in campaign book* :lol:

Nice, I really like this idea. I havent had a look at the link yet, though it should be interesting to check out. Basically, it's not a matter of controlling the PCs wealth, but more keeping control of the items that they have access to? That seems to make sense on the surface.

I find it very dry and mechanical to think that every low level fighter in the world will have roughly the same amount of treasure, and that every character's level can be guessed by the amount of valuables he/she has. So I want to know how many of you out there regularly 'tweak' the treasure...

So the assumption is that the only use a comely young elven female might have is one of 'dubious' nature? If the OP had mentioned that the setting was in ancient greece, would there be similar assumptions about people's 'twirky' attitudes toward the young boy? I'm sorry. I am wrong. You...

I'd have had another one suddenly materialise up behind them. Or told the characters that he rolled an AMAZING bluff check.

Meh, I've been in tonnes of real life encounters where Ive forgotten to use some of my 'abilities'. Sigh. I guess it just adds versimiltude :\

I think dragons seem to be designed to be slightly more powerful then their challenge ratings would suggest. I cant back that up, but as far as I've seen, dragons, even at even challenge ratings to PCs often present a very difficult challenge. This would make sense, as dragons are iconic, and...

Considering the value of a light horse is around 75gp, I'm sure that even the lowliest slave is going to be worth a lot more than 25gp. At least 10 times this amount, though often a whole lot more. Forget the slave merchant's stories of having to feed his starving children, slaving would have to...

...Though the kid looks like a halfling barbarian.

Noooooo!! I cant STAND gnomes and halflings looking like that. The artwork in certain books that depicts gnomes and halflings as simply scaled-down humans just totally destroys my suspension of disbeleif. Ive always pictured gnomes and halflings having their own unique proportions, gnomes...

Dodge!!!! Aaaaaaargh!!!! I ALWAYS forget it.