Search results

If you're a swashbuckler, the jab feat could be more useful if you had a free hand. I don't know what exactly constitutes "an attack" and what's something other than an attack, but could this include pulling the rug out from under an enemy, throwing a mug of beer in an enemy's face, throwing...

Since it seems that most people agree there should be some powers/maneuvers for martial characters (or tricks for thieves), I thought it might be helpful to summarize the ideas that have been thrown around, so they can be discussed/debated. If I didn't properly summarize an idea, or missed one...

I've never played 3e, so I never had to deal with trip specialists or grapple specialists, etc. When I played 2e and 4e, however, I usually played fighters, and fighters in 4e were more fun to play because of their powers, even if the encounter or daily limits didn't make sense. How about a...

This is what I want. WOTC can create and present a cleric and priest class that is fully playable as is. But, they should also let us under the hood so we can take the "divine power class" (or whatever) and fine tune it through options/powers/skills/themes to what we want our divine power...

Re Gyor: I don't think wotc would lose money. Instead of publishing more specific classes -- some of which will later be inevitably under supported -- wotc could publish more feats/skills/themes/powers/options for the four (or five or six) base classes. So a Heroes of Shadow book wouldn't...

Something similar to what Kamikaze Midget said is the way to go. Take the four core/base classes and tie them to power sources like in 4e. So the fighter (martial exploits), the thief (tricks, or whatever you want to call them), cleric/priest (divine powers) and magic-user (magic). The...