Search results

Basically yeah. Whatever benefits me the most at the time, but I wouldn't cross my group because in the long run it wouldn't be good for me. I just might go against their wishes or what they think is best, because what's best for them may not be best for me. That might even fall under chaotic...

So is it pretty disruptive for the group to all be aligned as good wit the exception of an evil character? I just wanna roll evil or unaligned so I'm not bound by anything, I can just do whatever I want and not worry about moral implications or my diety forsaking me. That's one reason I thought...

Ooooh I like the Athasian Halfling idea. I didn't even know they existed :) thanks As for the missing eye, I'll probably not roll with it if there is a chance of a minus to stats. At least not in the beginning of the game, maybe later I will talk to the DM and lose an eye in an important battle...

Im rolling neutral so I'm not evil exactly, I just have some mean tendencies. As an example, if it came down to intimidating someone into not saying something or just killing them, I'd opt to kill them so I didn't have to worry about them coming back and causing problems for me later or...

I've finally decided on a character and started using a halfling rogue, which works great because I like to steal and plan on causing trouble/being a smartass but I also plan on having a mean streak and even killing when we have the option not to. Should I just have a rough background to explain...

I was thinking along the lines of asking if I didn't have a power for it, like at a low level if he would allow me to ask "if I get a critical on this roll, would you allow it to do regular damage but slow him?" type of question. At least that way it's a give and take kind of thing, but I don't...

I think I'm going to try this build Whoops! Browser Settings Incompatible I'm not sure how well it will work but I'm gonna try it as a human. Also, I noticed when I add up the beginning stats of his character they add to 74, whereas my stats I was planning on using add up to 82. I used the...

Ive played a lot of other MMO and RP games before so I know basic things like flanking and all that good stuff, and I've always played a rogue type class which I've always enjoyed. I dabbled in playing as an archer in other games but I was hoping ranger archer in D&D could be more fun than a...

Yeah I definitely need to read up on stealth because I still don't understand it and the PHB1 doesn't explain it too well. Today I saw an interesting class though, a ranger/cleric. I've also been considering using a ranger as they are high damage and decent survivability, I'm just not sure how...

Why are they weak? I thought being a striker meant being able to dish out a lot of damage. And how do I roll a thief? I've never played before so I'm not familiar with older models of the game. Will I still be effective in combat that way and useful for the team?

Yeah I'm starting at level one. I'm probably just going to stick to being only a rogue. Now I'm stuck on feats now though. I guess I'll have to talk to the DM tomorrow and see what he says.

To me it seems like a good idea to just have a bit of diversity in your character, but I could be totally wrong. I'm very new.

So should I multiclass into something else like a cleric or anything or just strictly rogue?

Im very new to D&D and have bought the basic books but am still struggling to understand it all. I want to roll a brutal scoundrel rogue and multiclass to get better stealth or damage, but I can't decide if a ranger would be better or a warlock. I've heard striker/striker combos aren't that good...