Search results

I'm not going to go out of my way to confirm whether or not that's true (Nothing against you, mind you, I just don't want to say something definitive about a specific aspect I haven't looked into), but in this case I'm talking about the output. But thank you for the clarification. It's not...

What, you don't want to ragebait your users into more clicks for ads?! You're leaving revenue on the table, Morrus! :ROFLMAO:

Honestly if there is a problem with the GLC, it's that they have this weird mandate of "7200, only 2 per sector" when you could probably say "It's generally two per sector, but we have more at Oa in specialized jobs and certain sectors sometimes need more Lanterns. Earth is one of those problem...

I find it hard to be an artistic choice when you don't have a clue of what it outputs. I mean, heck, even the courts say no one owns Generative AI work. Better to be angry now and show them the distaste and backlash to the technology than to be flippant about concerns and then find out they...

I think this is the wrong way to look at it. People don't make features with the intent that they won't be used. They integrate them and push them to get usage, otherwise why are you spending money on them? Just look at what we are getting with AI. And NVidia certainly has the power to do this...

When you say "So it's not this, but this", it's absolutely coming off like you are looking for a gotcha. It looks like you're trying to make it look like these things are mutually exclusive when they are, instead, very much related, and then trying to make people's reasons for not liking this...

If it has any more to go at all. Sometimes technology hits a dead end. All the problems here are ones that are still endemic with AI, and trying to do real-time generation on something that is dynamic like a game is way harder than rendering something that is a static (i.e. not responding to...

Eh, in motion it does not look better. This video goes over it (including showing off where they mess up Grace's face), and in motion it has a whole lot of artifacting that makes it look worse. All the sort of AI stuff you've come to expect, with random morphs of solid objects to things ghosting...

I mean, kind of, yes. It's generative AI, so there's no actual consistency to the work, you just get what it outputs at that time. At some level, it has to strip away some intent because the AI can't actually take those things into account: it'll just paint it with whatever comes out. Artistic...

Truly, we should be trusting Todd Howard, dude who too often overpromises and is arguably the face of Bethesda, the gaming company famous for putting out games for the fans to fix.

I would largely say it's not just that people think they will lose their jobs over it, it's that people have, and the replacement AI systems have been problematic at best. Talking about people disliking "AI" as a "fad" misses all the currently problems with the technology, the overpromising, the...

I'm for Hal being sort of a grizzled, aging trainwreck. If you aren't just going to make him the dude from The New Frontier except that he's lived up into this time period through ring shenanigans, having him be a mess is way more appropriate. Johns tried this route, but I don't think it...

Was it really? I mean, the entire Companion line was mostly about more character options.

I feel like you'd have a bunch of people saying "These casters are so generic, they all just feel like one another" especially if you are talking about flavoring the magics around the previous classes instead of just giving the lists more flavor. As it stands, I don't really care for these...

I mean, it's changed like 3 times. Again, trying to balance for people who play at home as well as something for Society play isn't easy and is almost certainly the problem.

Yeah, when I think of the fiddly bits of PF2, I think Poisons/Afflictions and the Counteract system, though I think the latter would be solved by creating a clearer table (in trying to put all the info they could, they made it incredibly difficult to read). Maybe also the Crafting system, but I...

No, I'm just willing to engage with the design ethos. Like, tags aren't meant to explain something; they are "tags" because they are quick rules references for GMs. For the most part they mean what they say, and if you have a passing familiarity with the rules, they make it easy to understand...