We must be using conflicting definitions of the word. AFAIK, it means an exaggeration. I'm not exaggerating here. My experiences are not unique; I've seen many of the same complaints. Anecdotal? Yes. Hyperbole? No.
I wasn't aware of jumping down your throat a first time. If I came of...
Is it? Did you pay $30 for one and have your finger prints come off the front cover and then unbeknownst to you smudge most of the book as you parused it? Did you find the paper to be abnormally thin? Did you find that the book didn't stay open and "feel" like a book? Were your saddened by...
Totally agree, nothing cooler than OWNing something and being able to see it on your book shelf. Also very cool to support the industry, for without our $$ they would go away and I would be a sad panda.
I disagree with you there, however. My friends and I (who have purchased quite literally...
So every argument concerning why x is better than y is a combat argument? Skill bonuses are to be ignored? Half-Elves look awesome to me. They are what they are supposed to be, they are the new jack-of-all-trades (remember the second part to the phrase?). Having more hitpoints is way good...
So would you compare the original value to the new target's AC or roll again? Either adds an additional level of complexity for a miniscule ammount of damage. 4e already has plenty of "if miss" damage, this isn't very different.
I think that only Warlocks who take Fey Pact get Prime Shot, whereas all Rangers do. Since the images from GAMA show Rangers getting Prime Shot, I guess Riardon was from an earlier iteration of the rules where they did not?
Good, because I have been a busy boy. :) ...and thank you too!
No Multiple Attacks, Base Attack Bonus by class and Base Attack Bonus to Armor Class and Armor as Damage Reduction.
First, let me say congratulations to GreyWulf. Microlite20 is superb! Secondly, I've added a few new rules to the Macropedia; an Alternate Skill System, Fatiguing Damage, an option under Multiclassing, and Using Ranged Weapons During a Melee.