Search results

You can put anything in or out of any setting if you want to. The qualification is meaningless. The point is there is no “setting integrity” justification for not letting players play whatever they want.

If it looks like a book and quacks like a book?

Perhaps more likely: Strahd’s Book of Forbidden Magic. Not specifically Ravenloft (Fizban’s book wasn’t specifically Dragonlance) but including the sort of stuff you might find there, such as necromancers and reanimators, along with misc other things that need updating. Thereby Ravenloft is...

We already know, because it was established in earlier editions, and restated in 5e, that Mordy is a Doctor Strange cosplayer, not a Gandalf cosplayer. Elminster and Fizban are the Gandalf cosplayers. But, if you wanted to reference CoS Mordy, you would put in a stag, since that’s the form he...

Yeah it does. He is busy being a stag. Apart from the ones that aren’t.

Which the wizard definitely does not. Nor any other depiction or Mordy. And there are other things in the picture that do not relate to CoS. If the card is a hint, rather than just an artist’s doodle, then we might deduce that the wizard is a reference to a different upcoming product.

I do think the complaining about this is another example of the entitlement mentality. People seem to think they have a right to know.

What I find interesting is what I didn't learn at primary school. For example, I didn't hear of Beowulf until I was well into being an adult. Rosemary Sutcliff wrote a children's translation in 1956 but I never came across it when I was of school age. And local fairy and folk tales generally, I...

Certainly Fizban is pretty much indistinguishable from Gandalf, but I'm more inclined to say it's a representation of a PC wizard. The party may even represent PCs in the artist's own game.

Primary school. Aside from the regular Greek and Norse stuff I remember doing a compression on Baba Yaga, and reading the end of Robin Hood (the bit where he is poisoned by the abbess) in class. I also picked up some stuff on the BBC. I remember David Attenborough did a show for children’s TV...

UK now. And has been since I was at school myself. Primary teaching is largely based around topics. So they do Knights and Castles, the Ancient Egyptians, Vikings etc as well as myths.

Its used to as a vehicle to teach language skills and history. They also do Norse myths.

It’s a sign that WotC know the world is scheduled to end in fraction over five days, and therefore there is no point in making any products for next year.

I don’t think the latest Marvel films have been bad, I think it’s the audience has become jaded. My partner really liked F4, but I was more meh. But then I’ve always found the F4 a bit twee. It was the other way round with Thunderbolts.

More for TV though, and in animation. CBBC did one narrated by Tony Robinson.

Sure it is. The kids do it as part of the Greek Myths part of the syllabus. They don’t have to read the book, but they are told the story. I have taught parts of the text (in English translation) to ten year olds though, in preparation for Grammar School entrance exams.

I’ve seen several. That movie was one of the more boring ones. The book is a primary school text. Oh, and I’ve just seen Percy Jackson do it. And Eyes of Wakanda do the Iliad. Even people who aren’t familiar with the source material are going to be familiar with many of the scenes.

The thing about Shakespeare productions is that everyone puts their own spin on them. Branagh’s Much Ado is a very different movie to Weddon’s take. Prospero’s Books is very different to Forbidden Planet. I’ve seen Measure for Measure done as broad comedy, and I’ve seen it done as a serious...

But isn’t Nolan a big nerd? Why isn’t he tired of it? Surely it must be because he has a fresh take?! Most of the stuff in the trailer seems pretty obvious to anyone familiar with the story. We have the winds let loose, looking up at an approaching giant (who we can take as read has an ocular...

Likewise.