Search results

ok - let me know when updated

Looks ok - I did ponder about de-gendering "man-shaped" somehow. Maybe just "giant-like being"?

Yeah that was my thinking too

shall I have a crack at it or do you have an idea/plan in your head

Sounds good to me - no change in PB from 19 to 20 so no adjusting needed otherwise

.changed to....ugh WOTC why you have to go and change the layout?? (though that said, I like the new layout)

ok sounds good

Yes to pink text Tes to proposed action costs

Great - will get cracking on some simpler ones before we get to some mechanics haedaches.

Okay - have started - first one https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/5441564-giant-amblypygid

they all sound really good! sounds like plenty!

It's a dirty job but someone's gotta do it.... :LOL:

[I just googled this four years on, thinking, "that was a clever question someone asked".....and discovered it was me asking it :LOL:]

all good by me

5 rounds is fine - either is fine really if you feel strongly the other way

(update - was gonna start strictly alphabetical but the first one then would be Adonides...which is a big one. thought I'd start on some simple ones first)

ok so the other thing is the language has changed to become more concise. There are also changes in some statblocks e.g. poison saves - see Giant Spider 2024 vs 2014

Either 1 or 3b - so fire damage and burning automatic - 50/50 on blinding - could go either way - but if we have it a save is good. Probs leaning to 3b as it is such a high level monster the rebuke is more interesting

all those suggestions sound reasonable

yes. but I will convert then to 2024 formatting, which I like better