Search results

Lord's Alliance Agent is another feat that can grant allies inspiration. Chef is another good feat for buffs

I'm not a novice and I would appreciate if you want to insult me to do it at least directly to my face. And I stand by what I have said. I know that works like Dune, Wheel of Time or Foundation are huge deal in speculative ficiton genre. YOU know that. People who actualyl had decency to quote...

Hot yake but I think a lot of recent popular adaptations are of relatively ibscture material. This includes Wheel of Time, Foundation and Dune.

Added feats and Dhampir species from Astarion's Book of Curses

Weird, I recal I was looking over some 4e books and saw electricity as a damage type, must have misremembered.

I also think the names of terms like that or powers may have been in large why some people struggled to get into 4e as a fantasy game - when every class has "powers" it feels to modern to some people and it leads to "superheroes in fantasy" comments.

5e also changed elecrticity to lightning.

Question about the adventures - where are they located? I know some are described with specific location, but few others seem to have instead assigned a deity to it, and I'd like to know which regions they are for. I know Tenebrous Stone is in Daelands, what about others?

See, that reasoning I can see, if you led with that, we wouldn't have this discussion. No, it is important because implying the game was designed eith the idea other piblishers will go and fix it, it is the same as callind developers lazy and such claim need evidence for.

In Curse of Strahd, my players had a plan to set up Tiny Hut and hide Ireena in it for the night to ruin Strahd's wedding with her, but when they tried to grab her, Rahadin showed up and they set him on fire, alerting Strahd and starting the fight. They tried to cast Tiny Hut in the middle of...

I argue saying 5e was designed with assumption there will be 3rd party content to add things they said they wanted but didn't deliver is claiming designer laziness. It's whole reason I am arguing with you

And my point is that you draw intent from the fact no one did it and accuse developers if lazily trying to offload finishing the game to 3pp, while we do not know why it happened or what the intent or reasoning was.

exactly. ...making any conclusions about the intent is a complete guess work based on coincidences. Correlation doesn't equal causation and with no knowledge of how did the design process look, you cannot make declarations like these because you do not know what happenned and lead to specific...

I have an issue with that assumption in itself because we AGAIN do not know if it was their intent, nor what was the mindset and reasoning behind it. You are, once more, making assumptions.

I am starting to think you reply to my posts without reading them.

Again, you are making assumptions of intent with no evidence of one. Yes, let's assume that they promised things that did not materialize. Do you have any proof that they intended to just outsource material to 3rd party when they were releasing the game? No, it's just an assumption based on...

Not gonna lie, when someone is speaking the way as if they were in the room when decisions were made or can read designer's minds, I feel justified wanting links to sources of their claims. So you make assumptions based on your gut feeling and guesses, yet you present it as if you were having...

No, even in a casual discussion like this burden of proff is on one making the claim.

First of all, once you provide quotes, you should also include the sources, othertwise I do not know where to look and see if they actually said that and you are not making things up. Second, you didn't even said which Cook since there is at least two and, to my knowledge, neither worked on 5th...

Acctually, it's called burden of proof - if you make a claim that is not just your opinion, like claim that you know exactly what was the mindset and aim of creators of the game like if you were there or can read their minds, The idea of opening the license to 3rd party is not in itself a proof...