Search results

Maybe they think there are people who just want the book for the art and lore as an extension of board game.

If I understood the pledge levels and the timeline correctly, then you can pledge for $1 and spread the cost out. For example, I am interested in the 2nd edition Gloomhaven and miniatures but the pledge manager for the board game doesn’t close until Jan-24 (7 months away) and for the minis...

I think the minis were always intended for the board game. It has hundreds of cardboard standees, which helped with price, but lots of players have been asking for minis. The RPG release seems more coincidental and just an opportunity to present an alternative reason to buy. It is sort of...

Because Paizo site is down:

Just want to say this has brought a smile to my face. :)

Twitter trends (D&D, TTRPG and OpenDnD, Hasbro) would suggests that this whole thing is getting more traction by the hour. Surely WoTC can't resist saying something more for much longer.

But DMs deserve to get that feeling of elation when they role a natural 20.

If you go the developer’s website, you can subscribe to the playtest and get access to the material. Cowboy Bebop - Mana Project Studio

For me, I just want know how this will be implemented in D&D Beyond. I’m in the middle of a campaign and I hope that these changes are not retrospectively applied to any characters by default. Whether I like any of the changes or not, I accept that is it WotC‘s decision, I just hope that my game...

I really hope not. Pathfinder works (as much as we know it does) because of their business model and style of game, both of which is very different from D&D. I feel they would have to compromise too much of what I like about Paizo/Pathfinder to make it work for D&D. I wasn't impressed that the...

The latest version of Masks has specific Pulp Cthulhu stats and callouts for Pulp. Not sure about HotOE for specifically accounting for Pulp, but it would certainly be compatible.

I wonder if WotC will try and stop others using DnDBeyond in such a way, i.e., no one will be able pull the data into their own product. Unless they offer a vastly superior product, I suspect many would just stick with Above VTT and other products that are free.

Just because I’m interested in how this may affect future D&D vs. current D&D, doesn’t this change miss the point if it doesn’t apply retrospectively. At the moment Tasha’s is optional (if you have book) and UA is playtest. But this UA appears to make a statement that there is now an official...

Not wanting to continue any of my previous discussion on this, but after reading several more pages, my mind started thinking, what would 6e actually look like if WoTC continue with the current direction of travel, imagining that race and class both need an overhaul, and that more sacred cows...

Humans are +1 to everything, no choice there. Half-elves are the exception (and I don't have any half-elf characters in my current campaign), but they still have some limitation. And I would look at half-elves like wizards - I always say that wizards are a great class, but you do need to put a...

I don't want world build at all, I just want to open the book and play (I only use published adventures), and I want players at my table to be able to do the same.

Yes, but if a new race appears without racial ASIs, my players would then: a) ask me if I have a default assumption; and/or b) question whether this rule now applies to all existing races. And I would be like, I don't have a default assumption, and no, the rule does not apply to existing races...

Exactly. I feel like this change in approach is clearly removing something that some players actually want. As I said earlier, I want my D&D to come with some built-in defaults and not just a framework for me to have to then set up a world within.

3) Exactly what I am doing as I start to look for my next campaign.:)