Search results

Its not a matter of putting them in my game. I was complaining from a lore perspective. As i said the continuity of the lore is what draws me to the ip most of all not the rules themselves To say this another way, i own 70 dnd books 😅 BTW im not saying im objectively correct or anything, it's...

But 5e does have a canon. Everything in the core books is canon according to wotc themselves . And the core books mention 90%of everything important that happened in the past like the spell plague or the war of the spider queen etc. And the books are internally consistent, in dragon heist there...

But the thing is this can't be the case because a) adventurers league has a metaplot, parts of which hinge on 30 year old metaplots like the stuff surrounding phlan, and b) 90% of all significant past metaplots are directly refferenced in 5e books Heck the sundering is what kicked in 5e WHICH...

But its not actually a retcon. An actual retcon explains itself and preserves the continuity, commits and tries to position itself in the lore as the new reality in conjuction with everything else, it doesn't just lodge itself in there dropping anything reliant on what it thoughtlessly replace...

The only thing that annoys me is that they got rid of crystal spheres with no explanation which is a totally non lore compatible way to do. At least give us an explanation or commit to a retcon dont just go poof crystal spheres are no longer here. The astral sea instead of the phlogistron you...